Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A new clinical olfactory function test: cross-cultural influence.

Masayoshi Kobayashi1, Evan R Reiter, Laurence J DiNardo

  • 1Department of Physiology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, USA. m-koba@doc.medic.mie-u.ac.jp

Archives of Otolaryngology--Head & Neck Surgery
|April 18, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Surgical Treatment of Nasal and Ethmoidal Malignancies: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Therapeutic advances in allergy and rhinology·2026
Same author

Seromucinous Hamartoma of the Nasal Cavity: A Rare Entity Presenting a Diagnostic Challenge in Preoperative Biopsy.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Cost-Effectiveness of Individualized Occupational Therapy for Inpatients With Schizophrenia: Two-Year Follow-Up of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association·2026
Same author

Additive effect of free-choice olfactory training combined with pharmacotherapy: A retrospective analysis of post-viral olfactory dysfunction.

Auris, nasus, larynx·2026
Same author

Successful Multimodal Treatment of SMARCA4-Deficient Sinonasal Carcinoma.

Ear, nose, & throat journal·2026
Same author

A Long-Term Disease-Free Case of Biphenotypic Sinonasal Sarcoma with Intracranial and Intraorbital Extension Initially Misdiagnosed as Synovial Sarcoma.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Pathology quiz case 2.

Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·2014
Same journal

Pathology quiz case 1.

Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·2014
Same journal

Radiology quiz case 1: diagnosis.

Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·2013
Same journal

Pair of red and green macaws.

Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·2013
Same journal

Pathology quiz case 2: diagnosis.

Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·2013
Same journal

About this journal.

Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·2013
See all related articles

The Odor Stick Identification Test for Japanese (OSIT-J) can assess olfactory function in US patients, despite minor cultural bias in some odors. This olfactory test is quicker and preferred by patients over the standard CCCRC test.

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Olfactory dysfunction is a common complaint.
  • Standardized olfactory tests are crucial for diagnosis and management.
  • Cross-cultural validation of olfactory tests is necessary to ensure accurate assessment in diverse populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the Odor Stick Identification Test for Japanese (OSIT-J) for cross-cultural olfactory function assessment in a US patient cohort.
  • To compare the OSIT-J with the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center (CCCRC) olfactory function test.
  • To assess patient perceptions of olfactory testing methods.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional prospective study was conducted.
  • Fifty US patients with olfactory dysfunction complaints were enrolled.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Olfactory function was assessed using the OSIT-J and CCCRC tests, alongside patient interviews and self-reported function levels.
  • Main Results:

    • The OSIT-J administration time (8 minutes) was significantly shorter than the CCCRC test (21 minutes).
    • Strong correlations were observed between OSIT-J scores, CCCRC scores (r(s) = 0.80), and self-reported function (r(s) = 0.73).
    • Patients found the OSIT-J easier, more interesting, and its odors more pleasant, despite minor unfamiliarity with 3 out of 13 odors.

    Conclusions:

    • Cultural bias in olfactory test odorants should be investigated.
    • A modified OSIT-J demonstrates utility for assessing olfactory function in US patients.
    • The OSIT-J offers a time-efficient and patient-preferred alternative for olfactory assessment.