Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
On the value of doing nothing: anger and cardiovascular disease in clinical practice
Julie K Schulman1, Shannon Stromberg
1University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, USA. jksmd@mac.com
Insights
Current measurements of Type A behavior, anger, and hostility lack clinical evidence linking them to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Existing data do not support a meaningful relationship between these psychosocial traits and CVD development.
Area of Science:
- Psychosocial factors and cardiovascular health
Background:
- Type A behavior, anger, and hostility are considered potential risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD).
- Previous research on these psychosocial traits and CVD has yielded inconsistent results.
- Variability in measurement methods and outcome endpoints complicates interpretation of existing studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review existing quantitative and qualitative studies on the relationship between Type A behavior, anger, hostility, and CVD.
- To assess the clinical significance of current measurements of these psychosocial traits in relation to CVD development.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a comprehensive review of quantitative (meta-analytic) and qualitative systematic reviews.
- Utilized Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) criteria for study selection and evaluation.
Main Results:
- The reviewed studies exhibit significant heterogeneity in methodologies and outcome measures.
- Analysis of existing data did not reveal a consistent or clinically meaningful association.
- Disparate results were observed across the evaluated studies.
Conclusions:
- The current evidence does not support a significant clinical relationship between commonly measured psychosocial traits (Type A behavior, anger, hostility) and the development of cardiovascular disease.
- Further research with standardized methodologies may be warranted, but current data are insufficient.
Abstract:
Type A behavior, anger, and hostility have all been described as psychosocial risk factors or potential risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, in the populations evaluated, the methods used to measure these traits and the endpoints used to determine outcomes have varied widely. The results of these studies have also been quite disparate. The present article reviews data from all the existing quantitative (meta-analytic) and qualitative systematic review articles that cover this topic, using the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) criteria. We conclude that the existing data do not support a meaningful clinical relationship between current measurements of these traits and the development of CVD.
Related Concept Videos
Exercise and Cardiovascular Response
Light to moderate physical activity initiates a series of interconnected responses in the body. The heart rate modestly increases in anticipation of the workout, followed by widespread vasodilation as oxygen consumption by skeletal muscles increases. This results in decreased peripheral resistance, increased capillary blood flow, and accelerated...
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Antianginal Drugs: Nitrates and β-Blockers
Organic nitrates, such as nitroglycerin, play a pivotal role. Once metabolized, they liberate nitric oxide, a molecular marvel. Nitric oxide triggers guanylyl cyclase and augments cGMP production. This biochemical cascade orchestrates the relaxation of vascular smooth muscles, ushering in vasodilation and enhancing coronary blood flow. Administered...
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
