Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Preliminary Study on Acupuncture Combined with Grain-sized Moxibustion for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis with Finger Joint Pain
Published on: May 16, 2025
Cost effectiveness analysis of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis
Manathip Osiri1, Pirom Kamolratanakul, Andreas Maetzel
1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Rama IV Road, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand. Manathip.O@chula.ac.th
Abstract:
The objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of various DMARDs compared with antimalarials (AM) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment. The data on disease activity, functional status and societal costs were collected from a 1-year cohort of 152 patients with RA receiving at least one DMARD for > or = 6 months. Incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated from the societal costs of DMARD treatment compared with AM per one unit of HAQ improvement. All costs were presented in 2001 US dollars. Mean (SD) societal cost of AM treatment was US$ 2,285 (1,154) per patient per year. MTX + AM was less costly and more effective than AM, as the ICER of this combination would save US$ 834 per 1 U of HAQ improvement. MTX + SSZ, leflunomide, and triple therapy (AM + MTX + SSZ) were more effective than AM with additional costs. RA treatment with non MTX-based DMARDs was not cost-effective.
Insights
Methotrexate plus antimalarials (AM) is a cost-effective rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment. Non-methotrexate (MTX) based disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were not cost-effective for RA.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Health Economics
- Pharmacoeconomics
Background:
- Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management involves disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).
- Antimalarials (AM) are a common RA treatment option.
- Assessing the cost-effectiveness of different DMARDs against AM is crucial for optimal resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of various DMARDs compared to antimalarials (AM) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment.
- To determine the most economically viable treatment strategies for RA patients.
Main Methods:
- A 1-year cohort study of 152 RA patients was conducted.
- Data collected included disease activity, functional status (Health Assessment Questionnaire - HAQ), and societal costs.
- Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was calculated comparing DMARDs to AM per unit of HAQ improvement.
Main Results:
- Mean societal cost of AM treatment was US$2,285 per patient annually.
- Methotrexate (MTX) plus AM was more effective and less costly than AM alone, saving US$834 per 1 unit of HAQ improvement.
- MTX + sulfasalazine (SSZ), leflunomide, and triple therapy (AM + MTX + SSZ) were more effective but incurred additional costs compared to AM.
Conclusions:
- RA treatment combining MTX with AM demonstrates superior cost-effectiveness.
- Non-MTX-based DMARDs were not found to be cost-effective for RA treatment in this study.
- Combination therapy including MTX offers a potentially more economical approach to RA management.
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Rheumatic Heart Disease IV: Nursing Management
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF