Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Robotic applications in abdominal surgery: their limitations and future developments.

G W Taylor1, D G Jayne

  • 1Academic Surgical Unit, Clinical Sciences Building, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK. g.w.taylor@leeds.ac.uk

The International Journal of Medical Robotics + Computer Assisted Surgery : MRCAS
|April 19, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Costs of surgical futility in emergency laparotomy.

Surgery in practice and science·2025
Same author

Reporting of health-related quality of life in emergency laparotomy trials: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2023
Same author

Robotic complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right colonic tumours - a propensity score-matching study comparing with standard laparoscopy.

BJS open·2021
Same author

Trial of remote continuous versus intermittent NEWS monitoring after major surgery (TRaCINg): a feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Pilot and feasibility studies·2020
Same author

Dynamics of picosecond laser ablation for surgical treatment of colorectal cancer.

Scientific reports·2020
Same author

Patient education about recovery after colorectal surgery: systematic scoping review.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2020

Surgical robotics offer advantages for complex abdominal operations, but current systems are large and costly. Miniaturization and intracorporeal robotics are key to realizing the full potential of minimally invasive surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Robotics
  • Abdominal Surgery

Background:

  • Laparoscopic surgery has advanced abdominal operations, offering benefits like reduced discomfort and faster recovery for simpler procedures.
  • The efficacy of these minimally invasive techniques for complex abdominal surgeries remains unclear due to technical demands and instrumentation limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the current state and emerging technologies of surgical robotics in abdominal surgery.
  • To determine if robotic assistance can extend the benefits of minimally invasive surgery to more complex abdominal operations.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature search was conducted on surgical robotics in abdominal surgery.
  • Reference lists of sourced articles were reviewed for additional relevant publications.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Current robotic systems (e.g., da Vinci) are large, expensive telemanipulators with limitations like the fulcrum effect.
  • Development is underway for smaller telemanipulator systems and freely mobile intracorporeal devices to overcome current limitations.

Conclusions:

  • Existing robotic systems offer advantages over conventional laparoscopy but have limitations.
  • Miniaturization of robotic components is essential for advancing minimally invasive surgery.
  • Intracorporeal robotics represent a feasible future direction for minimally invasive abdominal surgery.