Effects of paying physicians based on their relative performance for quality
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Gary J Young1, Mark Meterko, Howard Beckman
1Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Talbot Building, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118-2526, USA. health@bu.edu
Background:
Studies examining the effectiveness of pay-for-performance programs to improve quality of care primarily have been confined to bonus-type arrangements that reward providers for performance above a predetermined threshold. No studies to date have evaluated programs placing providers at financial risk for performance relative to other participants in the program.
Objective:
The objective of the study is to evaluate the impact of an incentive program conferring limited financial risk to primary care physicians.
Participants:
There were 334 participating primary care physicians in Rochester, New York.
Design:
The design of the study is a retrospective cohort study using pre/post analysis.
Measurements:
The measurements adhere to 4 diabetes performance measures between 1999 and 2004.
Results:
While absolute performance levels increased across all measures immediately following implementation, there was no difference between the post- and pre-intervention trends indicating that the overall increase in performance was largely a result of secular trends. However, there was evidence of a modest 1-time improvement in physician adherence for eye examination that appeared attributable to the incentive program. For this measure, physicians improved their adherence rate on average by 7 percentage points in the year after implementation of the program.
Conclusions:
This study demonstrates a modest effect in improving provider adherence to quality standards for a single measure of diabetes care during the early phase of a pay-for-performance program that placed physicians under limited financial risk. Further research is needed to determine the most effective incentive structures for achieving substantial gains in quality of care.
Related Concept Videos
01:30Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
01:52Regression Toward the Mean
01:27Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
01:22Ethics and Bioethics
01:26Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
01:13Patient-centered Care