Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hypnotic history: a reply to critics.

Irving Kirsch1, Giuliana Mazzoni, Guy H Montgomery

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX United Kingdom. i.kirsch@hull.ac.uk

The American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis
|April 21, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Breast arterial calcification rates in screening mammography patients without a history of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs).

Clinical imaging·2026
Same author

Breast Arterial Calcification on Mammography: Act Now Please.

Journal of breast imaging·2026
Same author

Implementing Problem Management Plus (PM+) in Haiti: qualitative study.

BJPsych open·2026
Same author

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Hypnosis to Manage Musculoskeletal Pain in Breast Cancer Survivors Taking Aromatase Inhibitors.

Psychology of consciousness (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same author

Restoring STAR*D: A RIAT Reanalysis of Medication Augmentation Therapy After Failed SSRI Treatment Using Patient-Level Data with Fidelity to the Original Research Protocol.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

Preoperative Hypnosis versus Mindfulness for Reducing Postoperative Symptoms in Breast Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Anesthesiology·2025

Hypnosis research requires demonstrating that hypnotic suggestion effects are unique to hypnosis. Simply observing an effect after hypnosis is insufficient; control conditions outside hypnosis are essential for valid conclusions.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • The article clarifies the objective of Kirsch, Mazzoni, & Montgomery (2007).
  • It addresses misinterpretations regarding the article's stance on hypnosis theories.
  • The focus is on methodological rigor in hypnosis research.

Discussion:

  • A core principle in hypnosis research is highlighted: the necessity of control conditions.
  • The article emphasizes that observed effects must be attributable specifically to hypnosis.
  • It argues against attributing outcomes solely based on the presence of hypnosis.

Key Insights:

  • Hypnotic suggestion effects must be demonstrably unique to the hypnotic state.
  • Control groups are crucial for validating findings in hypnosis studies.
  • Methodological standards are essential for advancing the scientific understanding of hypnosis.

Related Experiment Videos

Outlook:

  • Future hypnosis research should prioritize robust control methodologies.
  • Clearer standards for attributing effects to hypnosis are needed.
  • This discussion aims to refine the scientific interpretation of hypnosis research findings.