Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a polypeptide...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Public Protests and the Risk of Novel Coronavirus Disease Hospitalizations: A County-Level Analysis from California.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2021
Same author

Breaking tolerance with engineered class I antigen-presenting molecules.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2019
Same author

Silent Tyrosinemia Type I Without Elevated Tyrosine or Succinylacetone Associated with Liver Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Human mutation·2016
Same author

PanFP: pangenome-based functional profiles for microbial communities.

BMC research notes·2015
Same author

Adenine nucleotide translocase is acetylated in vivo in human muscle: Modeling predicts a decreased ADP affinity and altered control of oxidative phosphorylation.

Biochemistry·2014
Same author

A new formulation of protein evolutionary models that account for structural constraints.

Molecular biology and evolution·2013

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Protein Target Prediction and Validation of Small Molecule Compound
10:21

Protein Target Prediction and Validation of Small Molecule Compound

Published on: February 23, 2024

Protein docking using surface matching and supervised machine learning.

Andrew J Bordner1, Andrey A Gorin

  • 1Computer Science and Mathematics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6173, USA. bordner@ornl.gov

Proteins
|April 21, 2007
PubMed
Summary

This study presents a computational docking method using machine learning to predict protein complex structures. The approach accurately identifies near-native protein complex conformations, aiding biological mechanism understanding.

More Related Videos

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Protein Target Prediction and Validation of Small Molecule Compound
10:21

Protein Target Prediction and Validation of Small Molecule Compound

Published on: February 23, 2024

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Structural Biology
  • Computational Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Experimental determination of protein complex structures lags behind isolated protein structures.
  • Understanding protein interactions is crucial for elucidating biological processes.
  • Computational docking provides a valuable tool for predicting complex structures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and assess a comprehensive computational docking procedure for predicting protein complex structures.
  • To improve the accuracy of protein complex structure prediction using a supervised machine learning approach.
  • To analyze factors influencing prediction accuracy and identify challenges in protein docking.

Main Methods:

  • Efficient conformational sampling using surface normal vector matching and shape complementarity filtering.
  • Clustering of docked conformations by Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD).
  • Scoring docked conformations with a Random Forest classifier trained on residue pair frequencies, propensities, evolutionary conservation, and shape complementarity.

Main Results:

  • The Random Forest approach successfully selected near-native structures for over one-third of heterodimer and homodimer complexes.
  • A significantly higher fraction of correct structures were found among highly ranked predictions.
  • Analysis revealed incorrect oligomeric state annotation as a key challenge for homodimer prediction.

Conclusions:

  • The developed computational docking method, integrating machine learning, enhances the prediction of protein complex structures.
  • Evolutionary conservation and shape complementarity are key features for accurate docking predictions.
  • The method shows promise for docking unbound protein subunits, advancing mechanistic studies of protein interactions.