Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

10:52
Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO): An Intervention Sequence
Published on: December 23, 2022
Percutaneous closure of ventricular septal defects
Gianfranco Butera1, Massimo Chessa, Mario Carminati
1Pediatric Cardiology - IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy. gianfrancobutera@libero.it
Cardiology in the Young
|April 21, 2007
Summary
Transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defects offers a safe and effective alternative to surgery. This minimally invasive approach demonstrates high success rates for both congenital and acquired defects, with reduced mortality and complications.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Surgical closure of ventricular septal defects (VSDs) is the gold standard but carries risks.
- Transcatheter techniques have emerged as a less invasive alternative over the past decade.
- These minimally invasive methods aim to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with traditional surgery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous closure for ventricular septal defects.
- To compare transcatheter closure outcomes with conventional surgical methods.
- To assess the suitability of percutaneous closure for both congenital and acquired VSDs.
Main Methods:
- Procedures performed under general anesthesia with fluoroscopic and transesophageal echocardiographic guidance.
- Utilized Amplatzer family devices for percutaneous closure of muscular and perimembranous VSDs.
- Reviewed literature data on successful closure rates and complication profiles.
Main Results:
- Successful closure rates for muscular and perimembranous VSDs are approximately 96% with ~2% major complications.
- Complete atrioventricular block is the primary concern, occurring in about 1.7% of cases.
- Percutaneous closure for post-myocardial infarction defects shows an 88% success rate but a 22% mortality.
Conclusions:
- Percutaneous VSD closure is safe and effective in experienced hands.
- It serves as a viable alternative to surgery for selected patients with congenital or acquired VSDs.
- Offers a significantly lower rate of mortality and complications compared to surgical intervention.

