Linear measurement error models with restricted sampling
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
Published on: January 17, 2013
Malka Gorfine1, Nurit Lipshtat, Laurence S Freedman
1Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Technion City, Haifa 3200, Israel. gorfinm@ie.technion.ac.il
Abstract:
The relationship between nutrient consumption and chronic disease risk is the focus of a large number of epidemiological studies where food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) and food records are commonly used to assess dietary intake. However, these self-assessment tools are known to involve substantial random error for most nutrients, and probably important systematic error as well. Study subject selection in dietary intervention studies is sometimes conducted in two stages. At the first stage, FFQ-measured dietary intakes are observed and at the second stage another instrument, such as a 4-day food record, is administered only to participants who have fulfilled a prespecified criterion that is based on the baseline FFQ-measured dietary intake (e.g., only those reporting percent energy intake from fat above a prespecified quantity). Performing analysis without adjusting for this truncated sample design and for the measurement error in the nutrient consumption assessments will usually provide biased estimates for the population parameters. In this work we provide a general statistical analysis technique for such data with the classical additive measurement error that corrects for the two sources of bias. The proposed technique is based on multiple imputation for longitudinal data. Results of a simulation study along with a sensitivity analysis are presented, showing the performance of the proposed method under a simple linear regression model.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Random and Systematic Errors
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Random Error
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Random and Systematic Errors

