Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Social Exchange Theory

Social Exchange Theory

We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).

Band Theory

Band Theory

When two or more atoms come together to form a molecule, their atomic orbitals combine and molecular orbitals of distinct energies result. In a solid, there are a large number of atoms, and therefore a large number of atomic orbitals that may be combined into molecular orbitals. These groups of molecular orbitals are so closely placed together to form continuous regions of energies, known as the bands.
The energy difference between these bands is known as the band gap.
Conductor, Semiconductor,...

Scientific Laws and Theories

Scientific Laws and Theories

Scientific Laws

Attribution Theory

Attribution Theory

Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).

The Atomic Theory of Matter

The Atomic Theory of Matter

The earliest recorded discussion of the basic structure of matter comes from ancient Greek philosophers. Leucippus and Democritus argued that all matter was composed of small, finite particles that they called atomos, meaning “indivisible.” Later, Aristotle and others came to the conclusion that matter consisted of various combinations of the four “elements” — fire, earth, air, and water — and could be infinitely divided. Interestingly, these philosophers...

Molecular Orbital Theory II

Molecular Orbital Theory II

Molecular Orbital Energy Diagrams

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Evaluation of surrogate endpoints for survival outcomes using the surrogate package in R.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2026

Same author

Integrating oral health screening into general practice: validation study of the Oral Health Screener.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Time-Scale Target Parameters and Two-Step Estimation in Longitudinal Trials for Progressive Diseases.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Same author

Handling Missing Data in Participants with Baseline but No Post-Baseline Data.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026

Same author

A review of evidence supporting amyloid beta reduction as a surrogate endpoint in Alzheimer's disease.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2026

Same author

Predicting unplanned hospital revisits among community-dwelling older adults: a dynamic cohort study.

European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Microglia as a Surrogate Biosensor to Determine Nanoparticle Neurotoxicity

Microglia as a Surrogate Biosensor to Determine Nanoparticle Neurotoxicity

Published on: October 25, 2016

Surrogate marker evaluation from an information theory perspective.

Ariel Alonso¹, Geert Molenberghs

¹Center for Statistics, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium. ariel.alonso@uhasselt.be

|April 24, 2007

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a unified information theory framework for validating surrogate endpoints. The new method offers intuitive interpretation and broad applicability, improving the assessment of potential surrogate markers in clinical trials.

More Related Videos

Preparation and Analysis of In Vitro Three Dimensional Breast Carcinoma Surrogates

Preparation and Analysis of In Vitro Three Dimensional Breast Carcinoma Surrogates

Published on: May 9, 2016

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 30, 2007

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 15, 2026

Microglia as a Surrogate Biosensor to Determine Nanoparticle Neurotoxicity

Microglia as a Surrogate Biosensor to Determine Nanoparticle Neurotoxicity

Published on: October 25, 2016

Preparation and Analysis of In Vitro Three Dimensional Breast Carcinoma Surrogates

Preparation and Analysis of In Vitro Three Dimensional Breast Carcinoma Surrogates

Published on: May 9, 2016

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 30, 2007

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Clinical Trial Methodology
Information Theory

Background:

Surrogate marker validation has been extensively studied over the last 20 years.
Existing validation frameworks often use a multitrial approach, defining surrogacy based on trial- and individual-level associations.
A limitation is the variety of individual-level measures used across different settings.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a unified framework for surrogate endpoint validation using information theory.
To provide an intuitively interpretable definition of surrogacy applicable across diverse situations.
To offer enhanced insight into identifying effective surrogate endpoints.

Main Methods:

Utilized information theory to construct a novel, unified framework for surrogate endpoint evaluation.
Developed a definition of surrogacy with improved interpretational advantages.
Demonstrated that previous validation proposals are special cases of the proposed method.

Main Results:

The information theory approach yields a unified and broadly applicable definition of surrogacy.
The proposed methodology enhances the understanding of factors influencing the identification of good surrogate endpoints.
The framework successfully integrates and generalizes prior validation measures.

Conclusions:

The developed information theory framework provides a robust and unified approach to surrogate endpoint validation.
This methodology offers practical advantages in interpreting and applying surrogate marker assessments in clinical research.
The study illustrates the framework's utility with a clinical psychiatry dataset.