Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Drawbacks to noninteger scoring for ordered categorical data.

Stephen Senn1

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK. Stephen@stats.gla.ac.uk

Biometrics
|April 24, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Response to letter to the editor.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Randomization and placebo effects in clinical trials of major depressive disorder.

Translational psychiatry·2025
Same author

Avoiding causal fraud in the evaluation of clinical benefits of treatments for Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

An early 20th century handbook on 'meta-analysis': David Brunt's <i>The Combination of Observations</i>.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2024
Same author

The analysis of continuous data from n-of-1 trials using paired cycles: a simple tutorial.

Trials·2024
Same author

Statistics, philosophy, and health: the SMAC 2021 webconference.

The international journal of biostatistics·2022
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Noninteger scores can improve trend tests but are generally less effective than simpler integer-based methods. This study examines the trade-offs in statistical power and practicality for trend analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Statistical methodology
  • Trend analysis
  • Non-parametric statistics

Background:

  • Examining a novel proposal to enhance trend tests using noninteger scores.
  • Evaluating the statistical power and practical implications of noninteger scoring in trend analysis.

Discussion:

  • Noninteger scores offer potential power improvements in trend tests.
  • However, these benefits are often outweighed by the complexity and reduced reliability compared to integer scores.
  • The simpler integer-based approach remains a more robust and practical option for most trend testing scenarios.

Key Insights:

  • Noninteger scores in trend tests do not consistently outperform traditional integer scores.
  • The practical application and overall effectiveness favor simpler, integer-based statistical methods.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical power improvements from noninteger scores may not justify their use.

    • Outlook:

    • Further research could explore specific contexts where noninteger scores might offer advantages.
    • Development of more refined noninteger scoring methods could be beneficial.
    • Continued comparison between integer and noninteger approaches is needed for robust statistical practice.