Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
Published on: June 21, 2019
A critical analysis of the resource-based relative value scale
1Department of Surgery, UCLA School of Medicine 90024-1741.
Insights
Physician reimbursement rates are not substantially different hourly between medical and surgical specialties. The resource-based relative value scale (RBRVS) and Medicare fee schedule are inappropriate for reforming physician reimbursement.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Medical Policy
- Physician Reimbursement
Background:
- A perception exists that procedural medical services are reimbursed at a higher rate than cognitive services.
- Congress mandated the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) to establish a Medicare fee schedule to shift funding from procedural to cognitive services.
- A resource-based relative value scale (RBRVS) was developed to provide a rational basis for this shift by equating service value to necessary resources.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate physician reimbursement rates using a standard commercial/industrial method (income divided by hours of labor).
- To recompute reimbursement rates under proposed payment systems, including the RBRVS and HCFA fee schedule.
- To assess the appropriateness of the RBRVS and HCFA fee schedule as bases for physician reimbursement reform.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed income and hours of professional effort for 15 medical and surgical specialties using independent data sources.
- Employed the standard commercial/industrial method of determining reimbursement rate (income/hours of labor).
- Utilized predicted income changes from the Harvard-Hsiao RBRVS and HCFA fee schedule to recompute reimbursement rates.
Main Results:
- Average hourly reimbursement rates for medical ($33.90) and surgical ($38.80) specialties were not substantially different.
- The difference in annual income between specialties was primarily explained by surgeons' additional weekly work hours (17.2 hours more).
- The proposed RBRVS and HCFA payment system equalized incomes but did not recognize hours of effort, training, or work differences.
Conclusions:
- The RBRVS and HCFA fee schedule are inappropriate bases for reforming the physician reimbursement system.
- The perception of higher reimbursement for procedural services likely stems from billing methods, not actual hourly rates.
- Reimbursement reform should consider factors beyond resource allocation, such as actual work effort and training.
Unlabelled:
BACKGROUND--There is a general perception that procedural medical services are reimbursed at an inappropriately greater rate than cognitive services. By congressional mandate, the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) has been directed to establish a Medicare fee schedule to shift funding under a budget-neutral assumption from procedural to cognitive services. To provide a rational basis for this change, Hsiao et al (Harvard-Hsiao) developed a resource-based relative value scale (RBRVS) that equates the value of a service to the resources necessary to generate the service. METHODS--Instead of focusing on relative values and fee schedules ("price-per-unit-service"), the present study employs the standard commercial/industrial method of determining reimbursement rate (income divided by hours of labor) for 15 medical and surgical specialties. Data from independent sources are used to determine income and hours of professional effort for each of the specialties studied. Harvard-Hsiao and HCFA predicted the percent change in income for each of the specialties under the initial RBRVS and the HCFA fee schedule. The predicted income was then employed in this study to recompute reimbursement rates under the newly proposed payment systems.
Results:
CURRENT PAYMENT SYSTEM--Average annual incomes for medical and surgical specialties are $124,500 and $176,600, respectively, a 42% difference (P = .03). Average weekly work hours (nominal hours, as adjusted for overtime) for medical and surgical specialties are 70.6 and 87.8, respectively (P = .005). Average hourly reimbursement rates for medical ($33.90) and surgical ($38.80) specialties are not substantially different (P, not significant). The difference in annual income is explained by the 17.2 hours per week of additional work hours by surgeons. The erroneous perception that procedurists are reimbursed at a higher rate than cognitive practitioners likely arises from differences in billing methods by which surgeons shift charges for cognitive work hours to the 18% of their time spent in the operating room.
Results:
PROPOSED RBRVS AND HCFA PAYMENT SYSTEM--The income of all specialties is equalized about a mean of $132,500 (+/- $21,400 [1 SD]) by varying reimbursement rates in such a way that the effect of working hours is fully discounted. Reimbursement rates under the proposed payment system make no recognition of the hours of professional effort, postgraduate specialty training, or putative differences in the nature of the physician's work.
Conclusion:
--The RBRVS, and the HCFA fee schedule to the extent that it is based on that scale, are inappropriate bases for the reform of the physician reimbursement system.
Related Concept Videos
Ratio Level of Measurement
A set of data measured using the ratio scale takes care of the ratio problem and provides complete information. Ratio scale data are like interval scale data, except they have a zero point and ratios can be calculated. For...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Estimation of the Physical Quantities
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
First Derivative Test: Problem Solving
Equity Theory
