Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Human Liver Microphysiological System for Assessing Drug-Induced Liver Toxicity In Vitro
Published on: January 31, 2022
Identification of genes implicated in methapyrilene-induced hepatotoxicity by comparing differential gene expression
J Todd Auman1, Jeff Chou, Kevin Gerrish
1National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
Background:
Toxicogenomics experiments often reveal thousands of transcript alterations that are related to multiple processes, making it difficult to identify key gene changes that are related to the toxicity of interest.
Objectives:
The objective of this study was to compare gene expression changes in a nontarget tissue to the target tissue for toxicity to help identify toxicity-related genes.
Methods:
Male rats were given the hepatotoxicant methapyrilene at two dose levels, with livers and kidneys removed 24 hr after one, three, and seven doses for gene expression analysis. To identify gene changes likely to be related to toxicity, we analyzed genes on the basis of their temporal pattern of change using a program developed at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, termed "EPIG" (extracting gene expression patterns and identifying co-expressed genes).
Results:
High-dose methapyrilene elicited hepatic damage that increased in severity with the number of doses, whereas no treatment-related lesions were observed in the kidney. High-dose methapyrilene elicited thousands of gene changes in the liver at each time point, whereas many fewer gene changes were observed in the kidney. EPIG analysis identified patterns of gene expression correlated to the observed toxicity, including genes associated with endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response.
Conclusions:
By factoring in dose level, number of doses, and tissue into the analysis of gene expression elicited by methapyrilene, we were able to identify genes likely to not be implicated in toxicity, thereby allowing us to focus on a subset of genes to identify toxicity-related processes.
Insights
Comparing gene expression in target and non-target tissues helps identify toxicity-related genes. Analyzing temporal patterns with EPIG aids in pinpointing key transcript alterations linked to toxic effects.
Area of Science:
- Toxicogenomics
- Gene expression analysis
- Computational biology
Background:
- Toxicogenomics studies often yield numerous transcript alterations, complicating the identification of key toxicity-related genes.
- Distinguishing between direct toxicity effects and secondary responses is a significant challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare gene expression changes in non-target tissues versus target tissues for toxicity.
- To identify specific genes associated with observed toxicological outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Male rats were administered the hepatotoxicant methapyrilene at varying doses.
- Liver and kidney tissues were collected at multiple time points (24 hours, 3 doses, 7 doses) for gene expression analysis.
- The EPIG (extracting gene expression patterns and identifying co-expressed genes) program was utilized to analyze temporal gene expression patterns.
Main Results:
- High-dose methapyrilene induced dose-dependent hepatic damage, with no observed kidney lesions.
- Thousands of gene expression changes were detected in the liver, while fewer changes were noted in the kidney.
- EPIG analysis revealed gene expression patterns correlated with toxicity, including those related to endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response.
Conclusions:
- Integrating dose, time, and tissue information into gene expression analysis aids in filtering out non-implicated genes.
- This approach allows for a focused identification of genes directly related to toxicological processes.
- The study successfully identified key genes associated with methapyrilene-induced hepatotoxicity.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase
Pharmacogenetics of Phase II Enzymes: N-acetyltransferase, Thiopurine S-methyltransferase, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Pharmacogenetic Phenotypes: Alterations in Pharmacokinetics, Drug Targets and Biologic Milieu
Pharmacogenetics of Phase I Enzymes: Cytochrome P450 Isozymes