Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sterilization wrap inspections do not adequately evaluate instrument sterility.

Walid R Waked1, Andrew K Simpson, Christopher P Miller

  • 1Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8071, USA.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
|April 25, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cadaveric analysis of plantar fascia strain and the development of a plantar fascia stretching device.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same author

Minimally Invasive Arthroscopy-Assisted Tibiotalocalcaneal Nailing for Complex Hindfoot Deformities: A Technique Tip.

Foot & ankle specialist·2026
Same author

Enhancing Ankle Arthrodesis in Complex Cases: The Role of the Vascularized Fibula Flap.

Annals of plastic surgery·2025
Same author

Minimally Invasive vs Open First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Cheilectomy: Radiographic Outcomes and Early Complications.

The archives of bone and joint surgery·2025
Same author

Thoracolumbar Fracture: A Natural History Study of Survival Following Injury.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2025
Same author

The Medial Mini-Open Supine Achilles Repair: Outcomes of a Medially Based Mini-Open Technique Compared With Prone Techniques.

Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews·2025

Routine inspection of surgical sterilization wraps for defects often fails to detect significant breaches. Even small defects, as small as 1.1 mm, can transmit bacterial contamination, compromising surgical site infection prevention.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Microbiology
  • Surgical Safety
  • Sterilization Technology

Background:

  • Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a significant concern in healthcare settings.
  • Sterile processing of surgical instruments is critical for preventing SSIs.
  • Surgical instrument trays are wrapped and inspected for defects before use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the sensitivity of current methods for detecting defects in sterilization wraps.
  • To determine the relationship between defect size and detection rates.
  • To assess the potential for bacterial transmission through wrap defects.

Main Methods:

  • Ninety sterilization wraps were prepared with defects ranging from 1.1 mm to 10.0 mm in diameter.
  • Defects were created using nails of known diameters.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Medical personnel visually inspected wraps for breaches.
  • Bacterial transmission through defects was assessed using contaminated nails.

    • Main Results:

    • Detection rates for wrap defects varied significantly with size, ranging from 6.7% for the smallest to 96.7% for the largest defects.
    • Substantial perforations (e.g., 6.7 mm diameter) were missed 18% of the time.
    • Bacterial contaminants were transmitted through defects as small as 1.1 mm.

    Conclusions:

    • Common visual inspection methods for sterilization wrap defects have low sensitivity, particularly for smaller breaches.
    • Significant perforations can be missed, potentially compromising instrument sterility.
    • Bacterial transmission can occur through even small defects, highlighting risks associated with current screening practices.