Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Why ecumenism fails: taking theological differences seriously.

H Tristram Engelhardt1

  • 1Rice University. Houston, Texas. USA.

Christian Bioethics
|April 25, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Courage: facing and living with moral diversity.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2015
Same author

Fair equality of opportunity critically reexamined: the family and the sustainability of health care systems.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2012
Same author

Bioethics critically reconsidered: living after foundations.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2012
Same author

Core competencies for health care ethics consultants: in search of professional status in a post-modern world.

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2011
Same author

Confronting moral pluralism in posttraditional Western societies: bioethics critically reassessed.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2011
Same author

Beyond the best interests of children: four views of the family and of foundational disagreements regarding pediatric decision making.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2010

Contemporary Christians hold diverse theological views, leading to significant disagreements on sin, suffering, and death. These differences impede ecumenism and fuel culture war disputes, especially in healthcare bioethics.

Area of Science:

  • Theology
  • Christian Bioethics
  • Philosophy of Religion

Background:

  • Contemporary Christianity is characterized by foundational theological disagreements among adherents.
  • These disparities extend to understandings of sin, suffering, disease, and death, impacting Christian bioethics.
  • Disagreements impede ecumenism and contribute to culture war conflicts, particularly in healthcare.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the moral-theological visions that differentiate various Christian traditions and their respective bioethics.
  • To highlight the divergence between contemporary Western theology and the theology of the first millennium.
  • To identify the root causes of this theological gulf.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of theological and philosophical differences across Christian traditions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative study of first-millennium Christian theology and contemporary Western theology.
  • Examination of differing views on the role of philosophy in theology and the meaning of 'church' and 'logos'.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant theological fragmentation exists within contemporary Christianity, affecting shared understanding and bioethical consensus.
    • A key divergence is identified between traditional and post-traditional approaches to integrating philosophy and theology.
    • Disparate interpretations of the 'church' and the 'logos' (Son of God) contribute to the theological divide.

    Conclusions:

    • There is no singular Christian bioethics due to fundamental theological disagreements.
    • The historical divide between early Christianity and contemporary Western theology stems from differing philosophical-theological methodologies.
    • Reconciliation requires addressing these foundational differences in theological understanding and practice.