Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Gene Regulation and Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis: Radiological Findings from Dual Energy CT and PET/CT
Published on: January 22, 2018
Gastric GIST malignancy evaluated by 18FDG-PET as compared with EUS-FNA and endoscopic biopsy
Masahiro Yamada1, Yasumasa Niwa, Tetsuo Matsuura
1Department of Gastroenterology, Nagoya Graduate School of Medicine, and Department of Endoscopy, Nagoya University Hospital, Japan.
Objective:
The usefulness of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET), whose high rate of FDG accumulation indicates high metabolism and malignant potential, has already been reported. The aims of this study were to evaluate the malignancy of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) in the stomach by 18FDG-PET and to correlate the FDG uptake values with known risk factors as determined by histology after EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or endoscopic biopsy.
Material And Methods:
Of 29 patients with histologically proven GI-mesenchymal tumours, 21 with gastric GISTs underwent 18FDG-PET. Tumour size, mitotic index, Ki-67 labelling index (LI) and cellularity of the tumour tissue were compared with the standardized uptake value (SUV) of FDG.
Results:
Strong correlations were found between the SUV of FDG and EUS size, and mitotic index of EUS-FNA specimens (tumour size versus SUV, p=0.004, r=0.542; number of mitotic cells versus SUV, p=0.0078; n=21). Moreover, we examined the association between SUV and risk categories based on EUS-FNA findings using ROC curves. The cut-off values of FDG SUV were 2.2, 4.2 and 6.5 for the very low-, low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups, respectively.
Conclusions:
18FDG-PET may be used to assess malignancy of GISTs. This image modality helps us determine the management strategy for these patients and complements the information on the biological behaviour and cellular proliferation of the tumours.
Related Concept Videos
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):