Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computational methods in protein structure prediction.

C A Floudas1

  • 1Department of Chemical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544-5263, USA. floudas@titan.princeton.edu

Biotechnology and Bioengineering
|April 25, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

High-throughput proteomic analysis of candidate biomarker changes in gingival crevicular fluid after treatment of chronic periodontitis.

Journal of periodontal research·2018
Same author

ASTRO-FOLD 2.0: an Enhanced Framework for Protein Structure Prediction.

AIChE journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers·2012
Same author

Structure prediction of loops with fixed and flexible stems.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2012
Same author

Enhanced Inter-helical Residue Contact Prediction in Transmembrane Proteins.

Chemical engineering science·2011
Same author

Discovery of entry inhibitors for HIV-1 via a new de novo protein design framework.

Biophysical journal·2010
Same author

New compstatin variants through two de novo protein design frameworks.

Biophysical journal·2010

This review details advances in computational protein structure prediction. It covers key methods like comparative modeling and fold recognition, highlighting current challenges.

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Structural bioinformatics
  • Protein science

Background:

  • Accurate protein structure prediction is crucial for understanding biological function and disease.
  • Computational methods have significantly advanced the field, offering scalable solutions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and categorize the latest computational approaches for protein structure prediction.
  • To identify key advances, limitations, and future challenges in the field.

Main Methods:

  • Classification of protein structure prediction methods into four categories: comparative modeling, fold recognition, and two types of first principles methods.
  • Analysis of recent developments and performance of these computational strategies.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Significant progress has been made across all four categories of protein structure prediction.
  • Current limitations include accuracy for novel folds and efficiency for large-scale predictions.

Conclusions:

  • The field of computational protein structure prediction is rapidly evolving.
  • Addressing current challenges will further enhance the utility of these methods in biological research.