[Treatment of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures--a review]

Andrzej Zyluk1, Tomasz Budzyński

  • 1Klinika Chirurgii Ogólnej i Chirurgii Reki, Pomorska Akademia Medyczna w Szczecinie.

Chirurgia Narzadow Ruchu I Ortopedia Polska
|April 26, 2007
PubMed

Insights

Metacarpal and phalangeal fractures, common in young adults, show good outcomes with various treatments. Current evidence suggests no single method is superior for these hand and finger fractures.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Traumatology
  • Hand surgery

Context:

  • Metacarpal and phalangeal fractures are common upper extremity injuries, representing 10% of all skeletal fractures.
  • These fractures predominantly affect individuals aged 10–40, impacting children and young adults.
  • Treatment outcomes for these injuries have been reviewed over the past two decades.

Purpose:

  • To present the results of various treatment methods for isolated metacarpal and phalangeal fractures.
  • To analyze the effectiveness of conservative versus operative interventions.
  • To highlight the current state of evidence regarding treatment superiority.

Summary:

  • Conservative management (elastic bandages, splints) is common for isolated, undisplaced fractures.
  • Operative fixation (K-wires, screws, plates, external fixation) is often used for unstable or displaced fractures, particularly phalangeal fractures.
  • Treatment outcomes are generally favorable across methods, with complications including nonunion, malunion, and joint stiffness.

Impact:

  • Current literature lacks definitive evidence supporting one treatment modality over another for metacarpal and phalangeal fractures.
  • Further research should incorporate subjective patient assessments of hand function using standardized questionnaires.
  • Understanding treatment efficacy is crucial for optimizing patient recovery and hand function post-injury.