Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is primary sensitivity testing on urine samples valid?

A P Blue1, D L Gordon

  • 1Department of Microbiology, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park.

Pathology
|April 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Creatinine concentrations of accumulated intrauterine fluid to confirm the clinical diagnosis of urometra in mares.

The Veterinary record·2017
Same author

Thalamic ependymoma presenting as recurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association·2015
Same author

Problems in the recognition of aortoembolic stroke.

Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association·2015
Same author

One-year outcome following biological or mechanical valve replacement for infective endocarditis.

International journal of cardiology·2014
Same author

Encrusted cystitis and pyelitis.

Internal medicine journal·2012
Same author

Single centre experience with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for hepatitis C: looking back before moving forward.

Internal medicine journal·2012
Same journal

Impact of the 2025 Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of primary aldosteronism for the clinical laboratory.

Pathology·2026
Same journal

Cribriform intraductal carcinoma of the prostate may have a greater prognostic impact even than Gleason grade 5 conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Pathology·2026
Same journal

Bordetella pertussis: emerging epidemiology, diagnosis and management.

Pathology·2026
Same journal

Development and validation of a real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Haycocknema perplexum.

Pathology·2026
Same journal

Recent advances in the understanding of TP53 in haematological malignancies.

Pathology·2026
Same journal

Concurrent renal amyloid light chain amyloidosis, light chain crystalline podocytopathy and light chain proximal tubulopathy: a case report.

Pathology·2026
See all related articles

This study validates primary sensitivity testing for urinary tract infections. Microscopic criteria accurately predict infection, and primary testing results largely align with secondary methods, supporting its use in clinical management.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical microbiology
  • Infectious diseases
  • Diagnostic testing

Background:

  • Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common and require accurate antibiotic sensitivity testing.
  • Current methods for antibiotic sensitivity testing can be time-consuming.
  • Primary sensitivity testing offers a potentially faster alternative.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the validity and clinical utility of primary sensitivity testing for UTIs.
  • To develop and assess microscopic criteria for predicting UTI and suitability for direct sensitivity testing.
  • To compare the results of primary sensitivity testing with standardized secondary methods.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective examination of 1800 urine specimens.
  • Development of microscopic criteria for pyuria and microorganisms to predict UTI.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of zone diameters from primary and standardized secondary sensitivity testing methods for various pathogens and antibiotics.

    • Main Results:

    • Microscopic criteria achieved a positive predictive value of 74.6% and a negative predictive value of 99.5% for UTI prediction.
    • Percentage agreement between primary and secondary sensitivity results ranged from 95.2% to 100%.
    • Only 2.0% discrepancies were observed, with 3 potentially clinically significant false negatives.

    Conclusions:

    • Primary sensitivity testing is largely in agreement with secondary testing for uncomplicated UTIs.
    • The method is adequate for clinical management and may allow earlier modification of empiric therapy.
    • Microscopic criteria can aid in identifying suitable cases for direct sensitivity testing.