Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Noninvasive Electrocardiography in the Perinatal Mouse
Published on: June 12, 2020
Single-centre experience on endocardial and epicardial pacemaker system function in neonates and infants
Massimo Stefano Silvetti1, Fabrizio Drago, Antonella De Santis
1Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Ospedale Bambino Gesù, IRCCS, Piazza S. Onofrio 4, 00165 Roma, Italy. silvetti@opbg.net
Insights
Endocardial pacing is safer and more effective than epicardial pacing in infants. This study suggests endocardial pacing may be the preferred choice for pacemaker implantation in this population.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Cardiac Electrophysiology
Background:
- Pacemaker (PM) implantation in infants involves either endocardial (ENDO) or epicardial (EPI) systems.
- The optimal pacing strategy for infants remains debated, impacting long-term outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the safety and efficacy of ENDO versus EPI pacing systems in infants.
- To identify factors influencing pacemaker system success in pediatric patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 56 infants (< or = 1 year) who received PM implantation between 1992 and 2004.
- Evaluation of pacing system failures, lead complications, and patient characteristics, including congenital heart defects (CHDs).
Main Results:
- Epicardial pacing was associated with a significantly higher risk of system failure (21-fold increase) compared to endocardial pacing.
- Lead failure rates were higher for EPI (atrial 18%, ventricular 24%) than ENDO (ventricular 5%).
- Patients with complex CHDs also showed a reduced success rate with EPI pacing.
Conclusions:
- Single-lead, VVIR ENDO pacing demonstrated superior efficiency and safety in infants compared to EPI pacing.
- ENDO pacing may be the preferred method for pacemaker implantation in infants, though further research with larger cohorts and longer follow-up is warranted.
Aims:
Endocardial (ENDO) or epicardial (EPI) pacing systems are implanted in infants but it remains unclear which system should be preferred.
Methods And Results:
We evaluated the results of children
Conclusions:
Single-lead, VVIR ENDO pacing had higher efficiency and safety than EPI, and it might be the best choice for PM implantation in infants. However, because of small patient numbers and lack of longer FU, these findings should be treated with caution.
Related Concept Videos
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...
Electrophysiology of Normal Cardiac Rhythm
Conduction System of the Heart
The pacemaker cells are located in two primary nodes: the sinoatrial (SA) node and the atrioventricular (AV) node. The SA node pacemaker cells can autonomously depolarize, triggering an action potential that leads to the...

