Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Genetic Screens

Genetic Screens

Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...

Cis-regulatory Sequences

Cis-regulatory Sequences

Cis-regulatory sequences are short fragments of non-coding DNA that are present on the same chromosomes as the genes that they regulate. These fragments serve as binding sites for transcriptional regulators, proteins that are responsible for controlling gene transcription and differential gene expression across cell types in eukaryotes. Cis-regulatory sequences can be close to the gene of interest or thousands of bases away in the DNA sequence; however, those sequences that are further away are...

Position-effect Variegation

Position-effect Variegation

In 1928, a German botanist Emil Heitz observed the moss nuclei with a DNA binding dye. He observed that while some chromatin regions decondense and spread out in the interphase nucleus, others do not. He termed them euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. He proposed that the heterochromatin regions reflect a functionally inactive state of the genome. It was later confirmed that heterochromatin is transcriptionally repressed, and euchromatin is transcriptionally active chromatin.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Diversification and recurrent adaptation of the synaptonemal complex in Drosophila.

PLoS genetics·2025

Same author

Sex and neo-sex chromosome evolution in beetles.

PLoS genetics·2024

Same author

Single-cell RNA-seq of Drosophila miranda testis reveals the evolution and trajectory of germline sex chromosome regulation.

PLoS biology·2024

Same author

Multi-locus genomic signatures of local adaptation to snow across the landscape in California populations of a willow leaf beetle.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2023

Same author

A chromosome-scale genome assembly and evaluation of mtDNA variation in the willow leaf beetle Chrysomela aeneicollis.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2023

Same author

Neo-sex chromosome evolution shapes sex-dependent asymmetrical introgression barrier.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Enhanced Northern Blot Detection of Small RNA Species in Drosophila Melanogaster

Enhanced Northern Blot Detection of Small RNA Species in Drosophila Melanogaster

Published on: August 21, 2014

Reduced selection for codon usage bias in Drosophila miranda.

Doris Bachtrog¹

¹Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0116, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. dbachtrog@ucsd.edu

Journal of Molecular Evolution

|April 26, 2007

Summary

Selection to maintain biased codon usage is weaker in Drosophila miranda due to its smaller effective population size. This reduction in selection efficacy allows for increased unpreferred codons, impacting gene expression.

More Related Videos

Maintenance of a Drosophila melanogaster Population Cage

Maintenance of a Drosophila melanogaster Population Cage

Published on: March 15, 2016

Ubiquitous and Tissue-specific RNA Targeting in Drosophila Melanogaster using CRISPR/CasRx

Ubiquitous and Tissue-specific RNA Targeting in Drosophila Melanogaster using CRISPR/CasRx

Published on: February 5, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Enhanced Northern Blot Detection of Small RNA Species in Drosophila Melanogaster

Enhanced Northern Blot Detection of Small RNA Species in Drosophila Melanogaster

Published on: August 21, 2014

Maintenance of a Drosophila melanogaster Population Cage

Maintenance of a Drosophila melanogaster Population Cage

Published on: March 15, 2016

Ubiquitous and Tissue-specific RNA Targeting in Drosophila Melanogaster using CRISPR/CasRx

Ubiquitous and Tissue-specific RNA Targeting in Drosophila Melanogaster using CRISPR/CasRx

Published on: February 5, 2021

Area of Science:

Evolutionary biology
Genetics
Molecular evolution

Background:

Biased codon usage is shaped by mutation, selection, and genetic drift.
Understanding the forces maintaining codon bias is crucial for evolutionary studies.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the reduction in selection for biased codon usage in Drosophila miranda.
To explore the role of effective population size in modulating selection efficacy.

Main Methods:

Comparative analysis of codon usage bias between Drosophila miranda and its ancestor.
Examination of mutation patterns in noncoding DNA.
Assessment of genetic variability in D. miranda and D. pseudoobscura.

Main Results:

Selection to maintain biased codon usage is significantly reduced in D. miranda.
Changes in mutation bias or biased gene conversion do not explain this reduction.
D. miranda exhibits lower genetic variability, indicating a smaller effective population size.

Conclusions:

Reduced efficacy of selection, likely due to a smaller effective population size, is the primary driver of decreased codon usage bias in D. miranda.
This finding highlights the interplay between population genetics and molecular evolution.