Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Planning, implementation and evaluation of cancer screening programs].

Klaus Giersiepen1, Hans-Werner Hense, Stefanie J Klug

  • 1Bremer Institut für Präventionsforschung und Sozialmedizin (BIPS). giersiep@bips.uni-bremen.de

Zeitschrift Fur Arztliche Fortbildung Und Qualitatssicherung
|April 27, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Heat exhaustion, domestic heat exposure and socioeconomic disparities among older adults: a cross-sectional mediation analysis from Germany.

International journal for equity in health·2026
Same author

A multi-center cross-sectional study to explore cancer patients' views on facilitators and barriers for the implementation of oncological exercise therapy.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same author

Intersectional inequalities in self-rated health in Germany across sex/gender, migration, education and income: a cross-sectional study.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2026
Same author

Exploring the associations between physical activity, sleep, sedentary behaviour, and mental health in young German children.

Journal of activity, sedentary and sleep behaviors·2026
Same author

Ascertainment of Cancer Cases in the German National Cohort (NAKO): Methods and Initial Results.

Deutsches Arzteblatt international·2026
Same author

Reflections on Visualizing the COVID-19 Pandemic for the Public.

IEEE computer graphics and applications·2026

Cancer screening programs require robust evidence of mortality reduction, ideally from randomized controlled trials. Effective cancer screening must include monitoring and address potential adverse effects for optimal public health impact.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health
  • Cancer Research

Context:

  • Review of epidemiological aspects of cancer screening programs in Germany.
  • Highlights deficiencies in past German cancer screening activities, including lack of central coordination, standardized reporting, and independent audits.
  • Introduces the new Mammography Screening Program as an improvement with integrated quality monitoring.

Purpose:

  • To review the essential epidemiological components of effective cancer screening programs.
  • To emphasize the need for evidence of mortality reduction from randomized controlled trials before program implementation.
  • To outline critical monitoring aspects, including test accuracy, intervention effectiveness, and adverse event evaluation.

Summary:

  • Cancer screening programs must demonstrate disease-specific mortality reduction through rigorous evidence, preferably randomized controlled trials.

Related Experiment Videos

  • For cancers with potential incidence reduction (e.g., cervical, colorectal), evidence of incidence decrease is also crucial.
  • Comprehensive monitoring, including test performance, positive case management, interventions, and mortality evaluation, is essential to ensure benefits outweigh harms.

    • Impact:

    • Informs the design and implementation of future cancer screening programs in Germany and globally.
    • Stresses the importance of quality assurance and monitoring for the success of screening initiatives.
    • Provides a framework for evaluating the effectiveness and safety of cancer screening interventions, using the Mammography Screening Program as a model.