Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Growing a Cystic Fibrosis-Relevant Polymicrobial Biofilm to Probe Community Phenotypes
Published on: April 19, 2024
Amplification of bacterial DNA does not distinguish patients with ascitic fluid infection from those colonized by
Sandra M G Vieira1, Themis R da Silveira, Ursula Matte
1Unit of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil. smvieira@hcpa.ufrgs.br
Objective:
To evaluate 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene amplification to diagnose spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP).
Patients And Methods:
According to a retrospective protocol, 31 patients with portal hypertensive ascites (serum to ascites albumin gradient > or = 1.1 g/dL) were studied. Ascitic fluid was analyzed as follows: Gram stain, aerobic and anaerobic cultures, polymorphonuclear cell count, and biochemical tests. Bacterial DNA was detected by polymerase chain reaction.
Results:
There were 8 episodes of SBP and 4 episodes of bacterascites (BA). Culture was positive in 4 of 8 cases of SBP and bacterial DNA was positive in 7 of 8 cases of SBP. Bacterial DNA was positive in 3 of 4 cases of BA and in 8 of 28 cases of culture-negative non-neutrocytic ascites (CNNNA). The PELD score, serum to albumin ascites gradient, and mortality showed no statistical difference between patients with CNNNA and the result of the bacterial DNA analysis.
Conclusions:
Although the 16S rRNA gene amplification was better than culture to diagnose SBP, bacterial DNA does not seem to allow a distinction between ascites infection and ascites colonization.
Insights
16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene amplification shows promise for diagnosing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) over traditional culture methods. However, it cannot reliably distinguish between infection and colonization in ascites fluid.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Infectious Diseases
- Molecular Diagnostics
Background:
- Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a serious complication in patients with portal hypertension.
- Accurate and rapid diagnosis of SBP is crucial for timely treatment and improved patient outcomes.
- Current diagnostic methods, like ascitic fluid culture, have limitations in sensitivity and speed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic utility of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene amplification for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP).
- To compare the performance of 16S rRNA gene amplification with conventional bacterial cultures in diagnosing SBP.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study of 31 patients with portal hypertensive ascites.
- Analysis of ascitic fluid included Gram stain, aerobic/anaerobic cultures, cell counts, biochemical tests, and bacterial DNA detection via polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
Main Results:
- 16S rRNA gene amplification detected bacterial DNA in 7 of 8 SBP cases, compared to 4 of 8 positive cultures.
- Bacterial DNA was positive in 3 of 4 bacterascites (BA) cases.
- 8 of 28 culture-negative non-neutrocytic ascites (CNNNA) cases were positive for bacterial DNA.
Conclusions:
- 16S rRNA gene amplification demonstrated superior sensitivity compared to culture for diagnosing SBP.
- Bacterial DNA detection using 16S rRNA gene amplification could not differentiate between true ascites infection and bacterial colonization.
More Related Videos
11:23Purifying the Impure: Sequencing Metagenomes and Metatranscriptomes from Complex Animal-associated Samples
Published on: December 22, 2014
09:49Investigation of Microbial Cooperation via Imaging Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Bacterial Colonies Grown on Agar and in Tissue During Infection
Published on: November 18, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Colonisation of Pathogens
Bacterial Signaling
Bacterial Transformation
Antibiotic Selection
Genomic DNA in Prokaryotes
Genomic Diversity in Bacteria
Although bacterial genomes are much...