Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2026

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
09:51

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve

Published on: September 7, 2022

Assessment of acetabular version by plain radiograph.

David C Markel1, John L Andary, Paul Pagano

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Providence Hospital, Southfield, MI 48075, USA. dmarkel@providence-hospital.org

American Journal of Orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.)
|April 28, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Assessing acetabular component version is crucial for hip implant stability. This study presents a simple radiographic technique using standard pelvic and hip views to evaluate acetabular component version, addressing a commonly overlooked but important parameter.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Effect of the COVID-19 Orthopaedic Joint Surgery "Restart" on Patient Outcomes in Michigan.

Arthroplasty today·2026
Same author

The Impact of Body Mass Index on the Risk of Postoperative 90-Day Infection Differs Between Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Large Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative Analysis.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Efficacy of Commercially Available Irrigation Solutions on Removal of Biofilms Grown on Porous Titanium Implants: An In Vitro Study.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2025
Same author

Variation in KOOS JR improvement across total knee implant designs: a cohort study from Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative.

Acta orthopaedica·2025
Same author

Biocompatibility of the InSpace subacromial balloon spacer: an in vivo murine pouch model cytokine analysis.

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery·2025
Same author

Manual vs robotic patellofemoral arthroplasty outcomes: A Michigan arthroplasty registry collaborative quality initiative-based study.

Journal of orthopaedics·2025

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Radiology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Radiographs are standard for evaluating acetabular component condition and position.
  • Assessing cement mantle and ingrowth potential is typically straightforward.
  • Component-bone positioning can be evaluated using methods like Ranawat or abduction angle measurements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of acetabular component version assessment.
  • To introduce a simple radiographic technique for evaluating acetabular component version.
  • To provide clinicians with a method to assess version using readily available radiographs.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing plain anteroposterior pelvis and hip radiographs.
  • Implementing a simple technique to assess acetabular component version.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2026

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
09:51

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve

Published on: September 7, 2022

  • Overcoming challenges of obtaining high-quality specialized views (e.g., true lateral) in outpatient settings.
  • Main Results:

    • The presented technique allows for assessment of acetabular component version.
    • This method is based on standard radiographic views.
    • It simplifies the evaluation of a critical parameter often overlooked.

    Conclusions:

    • Acetabular component version is an important factor influencing hip implant outcomes.
    • A straightforward radiographic technique enables version assessment using routine pelvic and hip X-rays.
    • This method improves the comprehensive evaluation of acetabular components in clinical practice.