Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

In vivo laparoscopic robotics.

Mark E Rentschler1, Stephen R Platt, Jason Dumpert

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA. mrentsch@bigred.unl.edu

International Journal of Surgery (London, England)
|April 28, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enabling Technologies for Remote Surgery.

Military medicine·2025
Same author

One year follow-up of the colon cancer patient cohort treated with a novel miniaturized robotic-assisted surgery device (mRASD).

Surgical endoscopy·2024
Same author

Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Miniaturized Robotic-Assisted Surgery System in Colectomy: A Prospective, Investigational Device Exemption Clinical Study Using the IDEAL Framework.

Diseases of the colon and rectum·2024
Same author

Defining digital surgery: a SAGES white paper.

Surgical endoscopy·2024
Same author

A Novel Articulating Chip-on-Tip Endoscope for Dynamic Middle Ear Surgical Visualization.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·2023
Same author

Deep Learning Segmentation of the Right Ventricle in Cardiac MRI: The M&Ms Challenge.

IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics·2023
Same journal

Updated guidelines for screening esophageal and gastric cancers in China: summary.

International journal of surgery (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Transoral robotic surgery in head and neck cancer: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.

International journal of surgery (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Device-measured physical activity and long-term outcomes in IBD: promise, plausibility, and clinical translation.

International journal of surgery (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Long-term efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid for the prevention of gallstone formation after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

International journal of surgery (London, England)·2026
Same journal

The longitudinal relationship between interoceptive sensibility and self-management behavior in stroke patients: a cross-lagged panel network analysis.

International journal of surgery (London, England)·2026
Same journal

SPP1+ neutrophil and exhausted CD8⁺ T cells infiltration predicting the early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma patients after R0 resection.

International journal of surgery (London, England)·2026
See all related articles

In vivo robotic assistants are advancing robotic laparoscopic surgery, offering surgeons enhanced views and control to improve patient safety and reduce trauma. These robotic systems show promise for the future of surgical procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical technology
  • Robotics in medicine
  • Minimally invasive surgery

Background:

  • Robotic laparoscopic surgery is a growing field.
  • Current limitations in surgical vision and manipulation exist.
  • The development of in vivo robotic assistants aims to address these limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate a family of in vivo robotic assistants for laparoscopic surgery.
  • To assess the potential of these robots to enhance surgical viewpoints and manipulator capabilities.
  • To explore the impact of robotic assistance on patient safety and trauma reduction.

Main Methods:

  • Development of fixed-base and mobile in vivo robotic assistants.
  • Testing of robotic systems in animal models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Performance of various surgical procedures, including cholecystectomy, prostatectomy, and nephrectomy, with robotic assistance.

    • Main Results:

    • Successful design and testing of both fixed-base and mobile in vivo robotic assistants in animal models.
    • Demonstrated feasibility of performing complex procedures like cholecystectomy, prostatectomy, and nephrectomy using robotic assistance.
    • Positive outcomes indicating improved surgical capabilities and safety.

    Conclusions:

    • In vivo robotic assistants represent a significant advancement in laparoscopic surgery.
    • These robotic systems offer enhanced vision and unconstrained manipulation, improving safety and reducing patient trauma.
    • The successful preclinical trials suggest a strong potential for in vivo laparoscopic robotics in future surgical practice.