Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The immersive virtual memory task: Assessing object-location memory in neurological patients using immersive virtual reality.

Neuropsychological rehabilitation·2023
Same author

Perceived stress of mental demands at work, objective stress and resilience - an analysis of the LIFE-Adult-study.

Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)·2023
Same author

Neurocognitive predictors of food memory in healthy adults - A preregistered analysis.

Neurobiology of learning and memory·2023
Same author

Influence of noninvasive brain stimulation on connectivity and local activation: a combined tDCS and fMRI study.

European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience·2023
Same author

Leptin, but not ghrelin, is associated with food addiction scores in a population-based subject sample.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2023
Same author

Modulatory dynamics of periodic and aperiodic activity in respiration-brain coupling.

Nature communications·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Best Current Practice for Obtaining High Quality EEG Data During Simultaneous fMRI
10:35

Best Current Practice for Obtaining High Quality EEG Data During Simultaneous fMRI

Published on: June 3, 2013

Evaluating gradient artifact correction of EEG data acquired simultaneously with fMRI.

Petra Ritter1, Robert Becker, Christine Graefe

  • 1Berlin NeuroImaging Center and Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. petra.ritter@charite.de

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
|April 28, 2007
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a systematic method to evaluate electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) gradient artifact correction techniques. It highlights the importance of selecting appropriate methods for optimal artifact removal and signal preservation.

More Related Videos

Reliable Acquisition of Electroencephalography Data during Simultaneous Electroencephalography and Functional MRI
11:00

Reliable Acquisition of Electroencephalography Data during Simultaneous Electroencephalography and Functional MRI

Published on: March 19, 2021

Concurrent EEG and Functional MRI Recording and Integration Analysis for Dynamic Cortical Activity Imaging
11:28

Concurrent EEG and Functional MRI Recording and Integration Analysis for Dynamic Cortical Activity Imaging

Published on: June 30, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Best Current Practice for Obtaining High Quality EEG Data During Simultaneous fMRI
10:35

Best Current Practice for Obtaining High Quality EEG Data During Simultaneous fMRI

Published on: June 3, 2013

Reliable Acquisition of Electroencephalography Data during Simultaneous Electroencephalography and Functional MRI
11:00

Reliable Acquisition of Electroencephalography Data during Simultaneous Electroencephalography and Functional MRI

Published on: March 19, 2021

Concurrent EEG and Functional MRI Recording and Integration Analysis for Dynamic Cortical Activity Imaging
11:28

Concurrent EEG and Functional MRI Recording and Integration Analysis for Dynamic Cortical Activity Imaging

Published on: June 30, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is valuable but challenged by MR gradient artifacts in EEG.
  • These artifacts, caused by scanner magnetic fields, significantly perturb EEG data.
  • Existing gradient artifact correction methods vary in effectiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and validate a systematic approach for evaluating and comparing EEG gradient artifact correction methods.
  • To introduce quantitative indices for assessing artifact reduction and physiological signal preservation.
  • To identify frequency-band specific performance differences among correction algorithms.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic evaluation framework for gradient artifact correction algorithms.
  • Exemplary evaluation of artifact template subtraction methods.
  • Development of indices for artifact reduction and signal preservation.
  • Comparative analysis of algorithm performance.

Main Results:

  • The proposed evaluation framework effectively compares different gradient artifact correction algorithms.
  • Artifact template subtraction methods were evaluated using defined indices.
  • Performance differences were observed across frequency bands for various algorithms.
  • The combined index proved useful in identifying issues during artifact removal.

Conclusions:

  • A systematic evaluation is crucial for selecting optimal EEG artifact correction methods in simultaneous EEG-fMRI.
  • The proposed indices provide a reliable measure for assessing overall performance.
  • Understanding frequency-band specific performance is essential for method selection.