Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
Published on: July 4, 2013
Are violence risk assessment tools clinically useful?
1Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Monash University, c/- Victorian Institute of Forensic Mental Health, Locked Bag 10, Fairfield, Vic. 3078, Australia. Andrew.Carroll@med.monash.edu.au
Validated violence risk assessment tools can improve general mental health practice by offering structured approaches and considering static and dynamic risk factors. Their appropriate use enhances clinical utility, contrary to common objections.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Psychology
- Clinical Psychiatry
- Mental Health Services Research
Background:
- Increasing concerns about violence in mental health settings.
- Limited integration of forensic violence risk assessment research into general practice.
- Clinician objections regarding the utility of risk assessment tools.
Purpose of the Study:
- To argue that clinician objections to violence risk assessment tools are misplaced.
- To demonstrate how validated tools can augment standard clinical approaches.
- To highlight the benefits of structured approaches and specific risk factor consideration.
Main Methods:
- Review of forensic research on violence risk assessment.
- Analysis of clinician objections to risk assessment tools.
- Argument for the utility of validated tools in general mental health practice.
Main Results:
- Validated violence risk assessment tools offer practical benefits for clinical practice.
- Structured approaches and consideration of static and dynamic risk factors enhance clinical utility.
- Inappropriate use of unvalidated tools is unlikely to improve practice.
Conclusions:
- Clinicians should embrace appropriate, validated violence risk assessment tools.
- These tools can significantly enhance general mental health practice.
- Evidence-based risk assessment is crucial for effective violence prevention.
Related Concept Videos
Relative Risk
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
