Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
Published on: February 5, 2014
Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic comparative methods
Anthony R Ives1, Peter E Midford, Theodore Garland
1Department of Zoology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA. arives@wisc.edu
This study introduces new statistical methods to account for within-species variation in phylogenetic analyses. These techniques improve accuracy by incorporating measurement error, crucial for analyzing phenotypic traits across species.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Quantitative genetics
- Phylogenetic statistics
Background:
- Phylogenetic methods often ignore within-species variation, which is unrealistic for many phenotypic traits.
- Within-species variation includes population differences, phenotypic plasticity, and measurement error.
- Ignoring this variation can lead to inaccurate phylogenetic analyses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop statistical techniques for analyzing phylogenetically correlated data that explicitly include within-species variation (measurement error).
- To provide methods for univariate analyses, correlation, principal components analysis, multiple regression, and functional relations (e.g., reduced major axis regression).
- To demonstrate the impact of measurement error on parameter estimates and improve existing methods.
Main Methods:
- Development of novel statistical techniques for phylogenetic analyses incorporating measurement error.
- Application of methods to univariate analyses, multivariate analyses (correlation, PCA), multiple regression, and functional relations.
- Derivation of methods capable of handling varying measurement error for each data point and adaptable to scenarios with limited error information.
Main Results:
- Failure to incorporate measurement error can result in biased and imprecise parameter estimates in phylogenetic analyses.
- The developed methods provide more accurate estimates of phylogenetic signal, trait correlations, and regression relationships.
- Explicitly incorporating measurement error and phylogenetic correlation improves upon existing methods, including conventional reduced major axis regression.
Conclusions:
- Accounting for within-species variation and measurement error is essential for robust phylogenetic analyses of phenotypic traits.
- The new methods offer a significant advancement in analyzing complex trait evolution by providing more accurate and reliable results.
- These techniques are illustrated with examples and simulations, with accompanying software available.
Related Concept Videos
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Microbial Phylogeny
Phylogenetic Trees
Phylogenetic Trees
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

