Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Echocardiographic Approaches and Protocols for Comprehensive Phenotypic Characterization of Valvular Heart Disease in Mice
Published on: February 14, 2017
Assessment of severity in aortic stenosis-incremental value of endocardial function parameters compared with standard
Antonio Vitarelli1, Miguel Cortes Morichetti, Ysabel Conde
1La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy. vitar@tiscali.it
Abstract:
Several studies have reported that patients (pts) with severe aortic stenosis and similar pressure gradients or even similar aortic valve areas may have quite different symptomatic status and clinical outcomes suggesting that other factors might have a significant impact on the pathophysiology of this disease. Our purpose was to assess the severity of subendocardial wall dysfunction in symptomatic and asymptomatic pts with aortic stenosis using tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), strain rate imaging (SRI) and cyclic variation of integrated backscatter (IB). We studied 68 pts with aortic valvar stenosis and 46 subjects with no signs of heart disease. SRI/IB indexes were calculated in the apical four chambers views at endocardial level. Early diastolic endocardial strain rate showed the best correlation with transvalvar pressure gradients and valve areas. Compared with controls, symptomatic pts showed a more marked decrease in endocardial strain, strain rate and cyclic variation of IB. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves suggested that the thresholds offering an adequate compromise between sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of symptoms were >/=60 mm Hg for the pressure gradient, less than 0.60 cm(2)/m(2) for aortic valve area, less than 20% for strain, less than 2.0 s(-1) for strain rate and less than 3.0 dB for cyclic variation. The combination of pressure gradient, aortic valve area and SRI/IB parameters resulted in an improvement of the overall performance for predicting the symptomatic state. Thus, SRI/IB parameters have an incremental value in differentiating symptomatic and asymptomatic pts with aortic stenosis compared with conventional hemodynamic parameters.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management