Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

The Evidence for Evolution

The Evidence for Evolution

Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.The collection of fossils within sedimentary rocks give a record of common ancestry and often depicts the history of evolution.

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...

Introduction to Epidemiology

Introduction to Epidemiology

Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...

Confirmation Biases

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Assessment of maternal diet inflammatory status and inflammatory markers in human breast milk.

PloS one·2026

Same author

Association of climate change with the spread of antimicrobial resistance genes in Salmonella: a longitudinal ecological and modelling study.

The Lancet. Planetary health·2026

Same author

Author Correction: Trade-offs in the externalities of pig production are not inevitable.

Nature food·2026

Same author

Longitudinal Trends in Pediatric Non-Salmonella Gram-Negative Enterobacterales Infections at a Tertiary Care Center in West Africa, 2005-2023.

The Journal of infectious diseases·2026

Same author

Klebsiella quasipneumoniae: a novel sequence type 1699 by whole genome sequence analysis from food fish in India.

Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG·2025

Same author

Discovery of glycerol phosphate and an immunogenic glycan motif in rhamnose-rich polysaccharides of Streptococcus uberis.

Veterinary research·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of the evidence.

Mark A Holmes¹

¹Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ES, UK. mah1@cam.ac.uk

The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Small Animal Practice

|May 1, 2007

Summary

This study explains the scientific basis of evidence in veterinary clinical research. It details common errors in interpreting research findings and compares different study designs.

Area of Science:

Veterinary Clinical Research
Scientific Evidence Evaluation

Background:

Clinical research papers form the basis of evidence in veterinary medicine.
Misinterpretation of evidence can arise from various errors in study design and analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

To describe the scientific basis of evidence in veterinary clinical research.
To discuss potential errors leading to misinterpretation of research findings.
To outline the main types of veterinary clinical research, including their pros and cons.

Main Methods:

Literature review of scientific evidence evaluation in veterinary clinical research.
Analysis of common errors in interpreting clinical research data.
Comparative description of different veterinary research methodologies.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

Understanding the scientific basis is crucial for accurate evidence interpretation.
Identified common errors include bias, confounding, and statistical fallacies.
Different research types (e.g., randomized controlled trials, observational studies) have distinct advantages and disadvantages.

Conclusions:

Accurate interpretation of veterinary clinical research evidence requires understanding its scientific basis.
Awareness of potential errors and the strengths/weaknesses of various study designs enhances evidence quality.