Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Critically appraising studies reporting assessing diagnostic tests.

Annette O'Connor1, Richard B Evans

  • 1Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA 50011, USA. oconnor@iastate.edu

The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Small Animal Practice
|May 1, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Scoping Review of PFAS Mitigation Strategies for Soil, Water, and Experimentally Exposed Fruits and Vegetables.

Journal of food protection·2026
Same author

Systematic reviews of animal studies - Report of an international symposium.

Veterinary evidence·2026
Same author

Efficacy of tylosin phosphate for liver abscess control in feedlot cattle, by treatment duration: a Bayesian network meta-analysis supported by a randomized trial.

Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2026
Same author

Alactic base excess is not a sensitive or specific diagnostic tool for outcome in horses with colic.

Frontiers in veterinary science·2025
Same author

Evaluation of Change in Center of Pressure During Perturbation of Balance Including Blindfolding in Healthy Dogs.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2025
Same author

Risk factors for, metrics of, and consequences of access to veterinary care for companion animals: A scoping review.

PloS one·2025
Same journal

Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Veterinary Medicine.

The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice·2026
Same journal

Practical Steps Toward Antimicrobial Stewardship for the General Practitioner.

The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice·2026
Same journal

Using Evidence-Based Veterinary Medicine and Artificial Intelligence to Support Clinical Decision Making in Veterinary Practice.

The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice·2026
Same journal

Feline Asthma-Update on Diagnosis and Treatment Recommendations.

The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice·2026
Same journal

Disease Prediction and Precision Veterinary Medicine: Applications, Opportunities, and Limitations of Artificial Intelligence in Small Animal Practice.

The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice·2026
Same journal

The Moving Target of Companion Animal Infectious Diseases: Emerging Threats and Evolving Solutions.

The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice·2026
See all related articles

Critically appraise diagnostic accuracy studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) checklist. This guide helps identify flaws and biases in diagnostic test comparisons for reliable estimates.

Area of Science:

  • Medical diagnostics
  • Biostatistics
  • Health research methodology

Background:

  • Diagnostic accuracy studies are crucial for clinical decision-making.
  • Methodological flaws can lead to biased sensitivity and specificity estimates.
  • Reliable appraisal of diagnostic test performance is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a framework for critically appraising diagnostic accuracy studies.
  • To highlight common flaws and biases in diagnostic test comparisons.
  • To introduce the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) checklist.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizes the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) checklist.
  • Describes critical appraisal of studies reporting diagnostic test comparisons.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Includes a glossary of terms relevant to diagnostic tests.

    • Main Results:

    • The article outlines a systematic approach to evaluating diagnostic accuracy studies.
    • It emphasizes the importance of identifying potential biases.
    • Guidance is provided for interpreting sensitivity and specificity data.

    Conclusions:

    • Adherence to rigorous appraisal methods improves the reliability of diagnostic test evaluations.
    • The QUADAS checklist is a valuable tool for assessing study quality.
    • Accurate diagnostic test assessment is fundamental for evidence-based medicine.