Cell Migration
Cell Migration
Chemotaxis and Direction of Cell Migration
Cytoskeletal Coordination in Cell Migration
Growth of Cartilage and Bone Tissue
Development of the Limb Synovial Joints
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Jun 10, 2026

Matrix-assisted Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation for Remodeling and Repair of Chondral Defects in a Rabbit Model
Published on: May 21, 2013
1Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA. tmorales@partners.org
This review explores whether chondrocytes, the cells in cartilage, can move within the tissue and what that means for cartilage development and repair. The authors looked at studies where chondrocytes were observed in isolated systems, in cartilage organ cultures, and in living organisms. They found that chondrocytes can move in the lab, and some evidence suggests similar movements happen in the body during growth and injury. Migratory chondrocytes still produce the right type of collagen, showing they keep their specialized function. The researchers also noted that cartilage injuries might allow chondrocytes to move more freely. While the evidence is not yet conclusive, the findings suggest that chondrocyte movement is controlled and may play a role in tissue development. More studies are needed to understand the full implications of these movements.
06:40Visualization of Chondrocyte Intercalation and Directional Proliferation via Zebrabow Clonal Cell Analysis in the Embryonic Meckel’s Cartilage
Published on: October 21, 2015
08:09Isolation of Chondrocytes and Chondroprogenitors Using Fibronectin Adhesion and Migratory Assay
Published on: October 4, 2024
Area of Science:
Background:
Articular cartilage is a dynamic tissue, yet the extent to which chondrocytes move within it remains unclear. Prior research has shown that chondrocytes can migrate in isolated systems, but their behavior in native environments is less understood. This uncertainty has driven investigations into whether these cells retain their specialized functions during movement. No prior work had resolved the distinction between migratory and stationary chondrocytes in terms of their molecular profiles. The challenges of cell migration in dense extracellular matrices are well documented, but how these apply to chondrocytes is still debated. Some studies suggest that chondrocytes may shift positions during tissue development and repair. Others propose that matrix disruptions could enable such movements in adult cartilage. This gap motivated a review of existing literature to clarify the mechanisms and implications of chondrocyte translocations.
Purpose Of The Study:
This work aimed to synthesize findings on chondrocyte movement across in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo models. The specific problem addressed was whether chondrocytes maintain their differentiated state while migrating. The motivation arose from conflicting evidence about the functional consequences of such movements. Researchers wanted to determine if in vitro observations reflect real physiological processes. They also sought to explore whether chondrocyte motility plays a role in tissue development or injury repair. The study focused on comparing data from different experimental systems to identify patterns. It aimed to highlight the need for more controlled in vivo studies. The ultimate goal was to stimulate further research into the biological relevance of chondrocyte migration.
Main Methods:
The authors conducted a literature review covering in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo studies on chondrocyte movement. They defined chondrocyte movement as translocation of the cell body. They compared migration mechanisms in other cell types to contextualize their findings. A method was developed to isolate migratory and stationary chondrocytes. Time-lapse video microscopy was used to observe movement dynamics. The researchers analyzed collagen synthesis in migratory cells to assess phenotype retention. They summarized findings from cartilage explant studies and in vivo developmental models. The review included data from multiple laboratories to ensure a broad perspective.
Main Results:
Migratory chondrocytes in vitro produced collagen II but not I, indicating a differentiated phenotype. Time-lapse imaging showed slow and directionally limited movement. Other studies reported chondrocyte migration out of cartilage explants. In vivo, rotational movements in the growth plate were linked to tissue development. Chondrocytes were observed moving from cartilage endplates to the nucleus pulposus in developing spines. These findings suggest controlled movements during tissue remodeling. Cartilage explant studies imply that matrix injuries may allow chondrocyte motility in adults. The data support the idea that chondrocyte movement is regulated and context-dependent.
Conclusions:
The available evidence suggests that chondrocytes can move in controlled ways during tissue development and repair. Migratory chondrocytes maintain their differentiated state, as shown by collagen II synthesis. In vitro movements may reflect physiological processes but require further validation. In vivo studies indicate specialized roles for chondrocyte translocations. Matrix disruptions may create conditions for chondrocyte motility in adult tissues. The case for in vivo motility is not yet proven but remains compelling. The findings highlight the need for more detailed in vivo investigations. Future work should clarify the functional significance of chondrocyte movement.
Migratory chondrocytes in vitro produce collagen II but not I, suggesting they retain their differentiated phenotype.
A simple method was devised to isolate and compare migratory and stationary chondrocytes based on movement and collagen synthesis.
Collagen II synthesis indicates that migratory chondrocytes maintain their specialized cartilage-producing function.
Studies show rotational movements in growth plates and chondrocyte migration from cartilage endplates to the nucleus pulposus in developing spines.
Chondrocytes move slowly out of cartilage explants, suggesting that matrix injuries may allow motility in adult tissues.
The authors propose that further in vivo studies are needed to confirm the physiological relevance of chondrocyte movement.