Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Atherothrombotic ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation
Gulcin Benbir1, Derya Uluduz, Birsen Ince
1Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Istanbul 34098, Turkey. drgulcinbenbir@yahoo.com <drgulcinbenbir@yahoo.com>
Insights
Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and carotid artery disease often have strokes not solely caused by emboli. Significant carotid stenosis increases atherothrombotic stroke risk, but conventional methods struggle with diagnosis and risk stratification in these complex cases.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation is a common cause of embolic stroke.
- Significant carotid artery disease coexists in about 20% of patients with atrial fibrillation.
- Stroke etiology in patients with both conditions is complex and not always cardioembolic.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate stroke subtypes in ischemic stroke patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).
- To analyze stroke etiology based on clinical, carotid ultrasonographic, and neuroimaging findings.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of conventional classification systems in these patients.
Main Methods:
- Classified stroke etiology using Hart et al. criteria and TOAST criteria.
- Collected data on clinical features and risk factors (age, hypertension, diabetes, etc.).
- Assessed patients with NVAF and ischemic stroke.
Main Results:
- Of 1938 patients, 106 (5.5%) had NVAF.
- Among NVAF patients, 46.3% had definite embolic stroke, 16.0% probable embolic, 11.3% possible atherothrombotic, and 16.0% possible lacunar.
- Significant carotid stenosis was associated with atherothrombotic stroke (p<0.001), but other risk factors did not differentiate stroke subtypes.
Conclusions:
- Significant carotid stenosis is linked to atherothrombotic stroke in NVAF patients.
- Conventional stroke classification systems are inadequate for accurate diagnosis and risk stratification in patients with multiple confounding factors.
- Further research is needed to refine diagnostic and risk stratification tools for this patient population.
Objectives:
About one in five patients with atrial fibrillation have significant carotid artery disease, but not all strokes are cardioembolic in origin in these patients.
Purpose:
We investigated stroke sub-types based mainly on clinical, carotid ultrasonographic, and neuroimaging findings in ischemic stroke patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).
Patients And Methods:
The etiology of stroke was classified as definite or probable cardioembolic, possible lacunar, or possible atherothrombotic, as proposed by Hart et al. and the TOAST criteria. Clinical features and risk factors (gender, age, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption) were designated as clinical variables.
Results:
One hundred and six of 1938 patients (5.5%) had NVAF. In patients with and without NVAF, hyperlipidemia was more common in patients without NVAF (p<0.001), while the prevalence of other risk factors was not statistically different. On the basis of the TOAST criteria, none of the patients with NVAF could be classified as having had an atherothrombotic stroke. According to the classification by Hart et al., of the patients with NVAF, 49 patients (46.3%) had a definite embolic stroke, 17 (16.0%) had a probable embolic stroke, 12 (11.3%) had a possible atherothrombotic stroke, 17 (16.0%) had a possible lacunar infarction, and 11 (10.4%) had a stroke of undetermined etiology. Besides the presence of significant carotid stenosis (p<0.001), none of the variables related to stroke were different among the sub-groups.
Conclusion:
Patients with significant carotid stenosis were more likely to develop atherothrombotic stroke, while other risk factors associated with stroke failed to point to an etiologic cause. It should also be emphasized that the conventional classification system failed to aid in the correct diagnosis and risk stratification in patients with multiple confounding risk factors.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis IV: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Ischemic Stroke l: Introduction
Transient Ischemic Attack l: Introduction
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

