Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Crossed categorization beyond the two-group model.

Darren Urada1, Douglas M Stenstrom, Norman Miller

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061, USA. durada@ucla.edu

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|May 2, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

First-in-Human Phase II Clinical Trial of Multiplex IntraTumoral Immunotherapy (MITI) in Patients with Metastatic Solid Cancer (Abscopal 5001 Trial).

Cancers·2025
Same author

Associations between recreational cannabis legalization and cannabis use disorder treatment outcomes in California, 2010-2021.

Journal of cannabis research·2025
Same author

Amphetamines: a current epidemic.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2025
Same author

Psychedelics: Safety and Efficacy.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2025
Same author

Adult use cannabis legalization and cannabis use disorder treatment in California, 2010-2021.

Journal of substance use and addiction treatment·2024
Same author

Recovery incentives program: California's contingency management benefit.

Preventive medicine·2023
Same journal

Outgroup friendships and social influence in the development of adolescent attitudes toward secondary outgroups.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

The impact of "relational" Artificial Intelligence on human well-being: A self-determination theory analysis.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

Is my loneliness killing me? Effects of loneliness and social isolation on transitions between cognitive status categories and death.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

Listening across the divide: High-quality listening promotes speakers' state well-being through basic psychological need satisfaction during disagreements.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

Morality cut both ways: The role of cognition and emotion in attitude moralization and demoralization.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

The predictive validity of vocational interests for life outcomes across adulthood.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
See all related articles

People process complex social information using simple, threshold-based methods, categorizing stimuli as "in-group" or "out-group." This categorization depends on situational context and task demands, moving beyond traditional two-group models.

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Previous research on crossed categorization used simpler stimuli.
  • Theoretical work offers diverse predictions for integrating multiple group memberships.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the processing of in-group and out-group information with complex stimuli.
  • To investigate how individuals integrate information from multiple group memberships.

Main Methods:

  • Four studies were conducted using complex stimuli.
  • Participants processed information involving crossed categorization.

Main Results:

  • Heuristic, threshold-based processing was supported over algebraic processing.
  • Participants created "in-grouplike" and "out-grouplike" metacategories.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The categorization threshold varied based on situational and task factors, influencing in-group favoritism and out-group derogation.

    • Conclusions:

    • Complex social information is processed heuristically.
    • The distinction between in-group and out-group is context-dependent.
    • Crossed categorization research offers advantages over traditional two-group models.