Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

08:45
A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
Published on: December 5, 2014
Task-set reconfiguration suspends perceptual processing: evidence from semantic priming during the attentional blink
François Vachon1, Sébastien Tremblay, Dylan M Jones
1School of Psychology, Universite of Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada. francois.vachon.2@ulaval.ca
Summary
Task set shifts disrupt the attentional blink, impairing processing of the second target (T2). This effect, particularly at Lag 1, suggests parallel processing of T2 and task reconfiguration is not possible.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive psychology
- Visual attention
- Human information processing
Background:
- The attentional blink is a deficit in processing a second target (T2) when presented shortly after a first target (T1) amidst distractors.
- Lag 1 sparing is an exception where T2 processing is spared if it immediately follows T1.
- Task set shifts, or changes in task demands between T1 and T2, can reduce this sparing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how task set shifts affect Lag 1 sparing within the attentional blink paradigm.
- To determine if perceptual processing of T2 can occur concurrently with task-set reconfiguration.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a semantic priming technique with visual targets (T1, T2) in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream.
- Manipulated the relationship between T1 and T2 (related/unrelated) and the lag between them.
- Introduced task set shifts involving changes in target location or task requirements.
Main Results:
- Semantic priming of T2 by T1 was significantly reduced at Lag 1 when a task set shift occurred (location or task switch).
- Priming remained unaffected at other lags, irrespective of task set shifts.
- The impairment was specific to the transition period involving task reconfiguration.
Conclusions:
- Perceptual processing of the second target (T2) cannot be performed in parallel with task-set reconfiguration.
- Task switching imposes a bottleneck that interferes with concurrent target processing.
- These findings elucidate the temporal dynamics of attentional control and information processing.

