Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Acquisition of structural versus object landmark knowledge.

Brian J Stankiewicz1, Amy A Kalia1

  • 1Department of Psychology.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|May 2, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Combining path integration and remembered landmarks when navigating without vision.

PloS one·2013
Same author

Tactile picture recognition: errors are in shape acquistion or object matching?

Seeing and perceiving·2011
Same author

Assessment of Indoor Route-finding Technology for People with Visual Impairment.

Journal of visual impairment & blindness·2011
Same author

Learning building layouts with non-geometric visual information: the effects of visual impairment and age.

Perception·2009
Same author

Lost in virtual space: studies in human and ideal spatial navigation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2006
Same author

Just another view.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2003

Participants prioritize learning building structure over object landmarks in virtual environments. This memory for structural landmarks, especially informative ones, persists for at least one year.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Virtual Reality Navigation
  • Spatial Memory

Background:

  • Understanding how humans acquire and retain spatial information in virtual environments is crucial for developing effective training and navigation tools.
  • Previous research has explored landmark-based navigation, but the differential encoding and retention of structural versus object landmarks require further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the acquisition rate and memory retention of structural landmarks (e.g., hallway layouts) and object landmarks (e.g., pictures) in novel virtual indoor environments.
  • To examine the influence of landmark information content on memory allocation and retention.
  • To assess long-term memory retention of landmark information after a significant delay.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using virtual indoor environments.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants were trained and tested in novel environments, navigating and learning landmark information.
  • Data were collected on the rate of acquisition and memory recall for both structural and object landmarks over time, including a 1-year delay.

    • Main Results:

    • Participants demonstrated an initial bias towards encoding structural landmarks (building layout) over object landmarks (pictures).
    • Memory allocation was influenced by the information content of landmarks, with more informative landmarks receiving greater memory resources.
    • Spatial memory for both types of landmarks, particularly structural ones, showed significant retention even after a 1-year delay.

    Conclusions:

    • Human spatial memory in virtual environments favors the encoding of structural environmental features over discrete objects.
    • The informativeness of a landmark plays a key role in memory encoding and retention strategies.
    • Long-term retention of spatial landmark information in virtual environments is robust, supporting the potential for durable learning.