Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch

Catherine M Arrington1, Gordon D Logan, Darryl W Schneider

  • 1Lehigh University.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|May 2, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Imagine No Resources: Attention Is Selection and Normalization for Choice.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same author

Separating decision and motor contributions to behavioral biases induced by manipulating stimulus probability.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same author

Spotlight on the past: Focusing attention on long-term memory.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Order is ordinal in serial memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

It was 40 years ago today: Reflections "On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: A model and a method" by Logan et al. (1984).

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

An Investigation of Attentional Networks, the Locus Coeruleus - Norepinephrine System, and Autism and ADHD Traits.

Journal of attention disorders·2025
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

This study on task switching found true task switch effects independent of cue encoding when participants identified the cued task. Cue encoding creates semantic task representations, not just cue-specific ones.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Performance

Background:

  • Task switching research investigates cognitive flexibility.
  • Distinguishing cue encoding from task processing is crucial for understanding task switching.
  • Previous models require refinement to account for cue encoding effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To separate cue encoding from target processing in task switching.
  • To determine if task switch effects are independent of cue encoding.
  • To elucidate the nature of representations formed during cue encoding.

Main Methods:

  • Six experiments were conducted using explicitly cued task switching paradigms.
  • Participants responded to cues, identifying either the cue or the cued task before target processing.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis focused on conditions enabling separation of cue encoding and target processing.

    • Main Results:

    • Successful separation of cue encoding and target processing occurred when participants identified the cued task.
    • "True" task switch effects, independent of cue encoding, were observed under these conditions.
    • Cue encoding appears to generate semantic, categorical task representations, not verbal or phonological ones.

    Conclusions:

    • Task switch effects can be isolated from cue encoding effects.
    • Cognitive representations during cue encoding are semantic and task-based.
    • Findings inform computational models of task-switching performance.