Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Measuring quality.

Cameron D Willis1, Susan M Evans, Johannes U Stoelwinder

  • 1Centre of Research Excellence in Patient Safety, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC.

Australian Health Review : a Publication of the Australian Hospital Association
|May 2, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Long-Term Outcomes of Trauma Patients After Treatment With Prehospital Tranexamic Acid: A Subgroup Analysis From the PATCH-Trauma Trial.

Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open·2026
Same author

'Panscans' for Trauma in the Emergency Department.

Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA·2025
Same author

Factors associated with a positive shock index in the prehospital setting after major trauma.

Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine·2025
Same author

Imaging for older patients with head impact at baseline conscious state.

Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA·2025
Same author

Evaluating the satisfaction of patients utilising the virtual emergency department service in southeast region of Melbourne.

Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA·2025
Same author

Emergency medical services utilization in acute stroke in Qatar - an observational cohort study.

International journal of emergency medicine·2025

Healthcare professionals must demonstrate high-quality care using quality indicators (QIs). While QIs have pros and cons, they are valuable tools for enhancing patient safety and meeting community expectations.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality Management
  • Patient Safety Metrics

Background:

  • Healthcare professionals face increasing pressure to not only provide high-quality care but also to quantitatively demonstrate performance against established quality targets.
  • Measuring healthcare quality is essential for accountability and improvement, necessitating reliable assessment tools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the role and implications of quality indicators (QIs) in healthcare settings.
  • To discuss the advantages and disadvantages associated with the measurement and use of QIs.
  • To examine the balance required between clinical perspectives and managerial control in QI development.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of quality indicators in healthcare.
  • Discussion of the characteristics of effective QIs (validity, reliability, sensitivity, specificity).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of the interplay between clinical practice and administrative oversight in quality measurement.

    • Main Results:

    • Quality indicators offer a structured method for assessing and demonstrating healthcare quality.
    • The development of QIs requires careful consideration of both clinical relevance and administrative feasibility.
    • QIs are not infallible but serve as important instruments for advancing patient safety and fulfilling societal expectations of healthcare.

    Conclusions:

    • While not a perfect measurement system, quality indicators are a useful tool in healthcare.
    • Effective QIs necessitate a balance between clinical insights and management objectives.
    • The strategic use of QIs can contribute to improved patient safety and public trust in healthcare services.