Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ethical stockmanship.

P H Hemsworth1

  • 1Animal Welfare Science Centre, Faculty of Land and Food Resources, The University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia. phh@unimelb.edu.au

Australian Veterinary Journal
|May 2, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effect of shadowed areas on smothering risk in three commercial free-range layer poultry farms, Australia 2019-2022.

Preventive veterinary medicine·2026
Same author

Risk factors for smothering in three commercial free-range layer poultry farms, Australia 2019-2022.

Preventive veterinary medicine·2025
Same author

Early human contact and housing for pigs - part 2: resilience to routine husbandry practices.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2024
Same author

Early human contact and housing for pigs - part 3: ability to cope with the environment.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2024
Same author

Early human contact and housing for pigs - part 1: responses to humans, novelty and isolation.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2024
Same author

Research note: Expert opinions of feather sucking and licking behavior in meat chicken breeder birds.

Poultry science·2024

Stockmanship ethics are crucial for farm animal welfare, focusing on stockpeople's duties. Improving human-animal interactions through training can enhance both animal well-being and stockperson job satisfaction.

Area of Science:

  • Agricultural Ethics
  • Animal Welfare Science
  • Human-Animal Interactions

Background:

  • Stockmanship ethics are central to farm animal welfare, encompassing duties owed by stockpeople to animals.
  • Scientific understanding of stockmanship's impact on animal welfare and human-animal interactions is essential.
  • Animal ethics extends beyond welfare to include economic, philosophical, social, cultural, and religious dimensions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the ethics of stockmanship, emphasizing stockpeople's duties to farm animals.
  • To examine the scientific basis of stockmanship's effects on animal welfare.
  • To consider the reciprocal impact of human-animal interactions on stockperson performance and job satisfaction.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review synthesizing scientific findings on stockmanship and animal welfare.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Ethical analysis of human-domestic animal relationships and moral obligations.
  • Consideration of societal, cultural, and economic factors influencing animal ethics.

    • Main Results:

    • Farm animals' capacity to suffer necessitates moral obligations and acceptable housing/husbandry standards.
    • Stockpeople's attitudes and behaviors directly influence animal welfare, with current practices sometimes falling short.
    • The inherent inequality in human-domestic animal relationships requires careful ethical consideration.

    Conclusions:

    • Ethical discussions involving all stakeholders are needed to establish stockperson competencies.
    • Training programs targeting stockpeople's attitudes and behaviors offer significant opportunities to improve human-animal interactions and animal welfare.
    • Ensuring community-acceptable standards in housing, husbandry, and stockmanship is a shared responsibility.