Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Reporting tendencies underlie discrepancies between implicit and explicit measures of self-esteem
Michael A Olson1, Russell H Fazio, Anthony D Hermann
1Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA. olson@utk.edu
Abstract:
The assumption that implicit measures assess associations that are not accessible to consciousness abounds in current social cognition research. In the present report, we question this assumption, focusing on the construct of implicit self-esteem as a case in point. Although researchers often argue that implicitly measured self-esteem is unconscious, we provide evidence that it is not, and that discrepancies between implicit and explicit measures of self-esteem are the result of reporting tendencies. Study 1 demonstrated that individuals for whom explicitly measured self-esteem is relatively high and implicitly measured self-esteem is relatively low admit to overpresenting themselves. In Study 2, implicit and explicit measures of self-esteem were related when subjects were urged to avoid over- or underpresenting themselves when responding to the explicit measures. We discuss the critical distinction between awareness of one's attitudes and awareness of their influence.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Self-Serving Bias
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
