Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Separating cognitive capacity from knowledge: a new hypothesis.

Graeme S Halford1, Nelson Cowan, Glenda Andrews

  • 1Griffith University, Mt Gravatt campus, 170 Kessels Road, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia. g.halford@griffith.edu.au

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|May 4, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Toward a comprehensive account of verbal memory: An embedded computational model across representational domains.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

A comparison of single-domain and multidomain executive functions cognitive training for enhancing cognition and well-being in older adults.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Cue-driven attentional guidance nearly eliminates salience effects in working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Long-term representational costs of overloading working memory.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

No evidence yet for functional independence of verbal short-term memory and long-term verbal knowledge.

Journal of neuropsychology·2026
Same author

Colors, characters, locations, and shapes: The capacity of working memory for multiple, dissimilar sets of items.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Misinformation as strategy: Epistemic consequences and the undermining of shared truth.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
See all related articles

Working memory and reasoning share capacity limits, quantified by active items and interrelationships. These limits may stem from the brain's ability to form and maintain bindings between memory elements.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Cognition

Background:

  • Working memory and reasoning are fundamental cognitive functions.
  • Previous research has explored their individual capacity limits.
  • A potential shared basis for these limits has been hypothesized but not fully elucidated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and investigate shared capacity limits between working memory and reasoning.
  • To quantify these limits in terms of active items and interrelationships.
  • To explore the underlying neural or cognitive mechanisms responsible for these shared limits.

Main Methods:

  • Developing principled procedures to measure and control for confounding strategies like recoding.
  • Quantifying working memory capacity by the number of active items.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Quantifying reasoning capacity by the number of active interrelationships, defining problem complexity and processing load.

    • Main Results:

    • Orderly quantification of capacity limits in both working memory and reasoning has been achieved.
    • Evidence suggests a shared capacity limit underlies both cognitive functions.
    • The ability to form and preserve bindings between elements in memory is identified as a potential common bottleneck.

    Conclusions:

    • Working memory and reasoning are constrained by related capacity limits.
    • These shared limits are quantifiable and may be rooted in the binding of memory elements.
    • Understanding these shared limits offers new avenues for cognitive research and potential interventions.