Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Three methods for optimization of cross-laboratory and cross-platform microarray expression data.

Phillip Stafford1, Marcel Brun

  • 1Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Center for Innovations in Medicine, Tempe, AZ, USA.

Nucleic Acids Research
|May 5, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Accurate Genomic Predictions for Chronic Wasting Disease in North American Elk.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same author

Multiplexed single-tier immunoassay for improved Lyme disease diagnosis across all disease stages.

Research square·2026
Same author

<i>BRAF</i> V600E Mutation Has Variable Tumor-Specific Effects on Expression of MAPK Pathway Genes That Could Affect Patient Outcome.

International journal of molecular sciences·2025
Same author

Freezing diluted bovine serum albumin standards does not significantly affect standard curves.

BioTechniques·2025
Same author

Profiling muscle transcriptome in mice exposed to microgravity using gene set enrichment analysis.

NPJ microgravity·2024
Same author

A Peptide Microarray Platform Approach for Discovery of Immunodominant Antibody Epitopes.

Analytical chemistry·2024
Same journal

Correction to 'New origin firing is inhibited by APC/CCdh1 activation in S-phase after severe replication stress'.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

VeloRM: disentangling pre- and post-splicing RNA modification dynamics at single-cell resolution.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Accessibility of telomeric overhangs to stabilizing small-molecule ligands.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Multivalent interactions mediate SNAIL transcription factor stimulation of the nucleosome deacetylase activity of the CoREST complex.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Genome-wide mapping of DNA G-quadruplexes in Trypanosoma brucei chromatin reveals enrichment in coding regions and transcription start sites.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Correction to 'The Gene Ontology knowledgebase in 2026'.

Nucleic acids research·2026
See all related articles

Microarray data quality is crucial for patient care. This study shows that choosing the right normalization method significantly impacts gene expression data accuracy and reproducibility across platforms.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Microarray gene expression data quality is vital for clinical applications.
  • Ensuring data accuracy and reproducibility is essential for the growing use of microarrays in diagnostics and treatment.
  • Existing data repositories like GEO face limitations in cross-experiment correlation and general applicability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of different normalization methods on microarray gene expression data quality.
  • To investigate how normalization choices affect data precision, accuracy, and historical correlation.
  • To provide a framework for calibrating microarray experiments by optimizing normalization parameters.

Main Methods:

  • A case study was conducted using a microarray calibration process with normalization as the key adjustable parameter.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Eight different normalization methods were examined across Agilent and Affymetrix expression platforms.
  • The effects of normalization were assessed on sensitivity, power, functional interpretation, feature selection, and classification error.

    • Main Results:

    • Normalization methods have pronounced and specific effects on data precision, accuracy, and correlation.
    • The choice of normalization significantly influences the interpretation of biological data and the accuracy of feature selection.
    • Variations in normalization impact sensitivity, power, and classification error rates.

    Conclusions:

    • Normalization is a critical user-selected factor in microarray data pre-processing with a substantial effect on results.
    • Optimizing normalization parameters is essential for improving data correlation across different laboratories and platforms.
    • Researchers are encouraged to assess their own discordant data to tune laboratory parameters for enhanced reproducibility.