Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Workshop overview: new molecular techniques in genome analysis.

D M DeMarini1, J C Fuscoe

  • 1Genetic Toxicology Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711.

Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Zebrafish irritant responses to wildland fire-related biomass smoke are influenced by fuel type, combustion phase, and byproduct chemistry.

Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A·2021
Same author

Mutagenicity and chemical analysis of emissions from the open burning of scrap rubber tires.

Environmental science & technology·2011
Same author

Predictive models for carcinogenicity and mutagenicity: frameworks, state-of-the-art, and perspectives.

Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews·2009
Same author

Comparison of biomarkers in workers exposed to 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene.

Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals·2007
Same author

Outdoor air pollution and DNA damage.

Occupational and environmental medicine·2006
Same author

World at work: charcoal producing industries in northeastern Brazil.

Occupational and environmental medicine·2005
Same journal

Evaluating the Suitability of HepaRG Cells for Regulatory Micronucleus Testing: Comparing Results for a Diverse Set of 28 Chemicals to Regulatory Accepted TK6 Cells.

Environmental and molecular mutagenesis·2026
Same journal

Resveratrol Mitigates Haloacetaldehyde Disinfection By-Products (HAL-DBPs)-Induced Oocyte Developmental Toxicity via Mitochondria-Dependent Pathways.

Environmental and molecular mutagenesis·2026
Same journal

DZNep: A Methyltransferase Modulator for Disease Mitigation.

Environmental and molecular mutagenesis·2026
Same journal

Transcriptional Dysregulation of Histone Methyltransferase Genes and Chromosomal Instability Associated With Chronic Pesticide Exposure.

Environmental and molecular mutagenesis·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of Type 1 Error Rates in Duplex Sequencing for Mutagenicity Testing Using Vehicle Control Data and Simulation Analyses.

Environmental and molecular mutagenesis·2026
Same journal

Benzo[b]fluoranthene Induces Mutation Accumulation and Cancer-Relevant Mutational Signatures in Mouse Lung Alongside Steady State Levels of Chromosome Damage in Blood.

Environmental and molecular mutagenesis·2026
See all related articles

This study reviews molecular techniques for genomic DNA analysis. Methods like PCR and FISH detect small and large DNA changes, respectively, with DNA sequencing offering the most detailed insights.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genomics
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Genomic DNA analysis is crucial for understanding genetic variations.
  • Detecting both small-scale mutations and large-scale alterations is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of diverse molecular techniques for genomic DNA analysis.
  • To categorize methods based on the scale of genomic changes they detect.

Main Methods:

  • Small-scale changes: Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), colony probe hybridization, mismatch hybridization, Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE).
  • Large-scale changes: Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH), Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE), Southern blotting, multiplex PCR, linked probe hybridization, restriction enzyme mapping.
  • DNA sequence analysis for detailed genomic change characterization.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Various molecular techniques effectively analyze genomic DNA at different scales.
  • PCR and DGGE are suitable for detecting gene mutations.
  • FISH, PFGE, and Southern blotting enable analysis of larger genomic alterations.

Conclusions:

  • A range of molecular techniques are available for comprehensive genomic DNA analysis.
  • Combining methods provides detailed insights into genetic alterations.
  • DNA sequencing offers the highest resolution for characterizing genomic changes.