Related Experiment Videos
Factors influencing variability in compliance rates and clinical outcomes among three different severe sepsis bundles
Jeffrey J Fong1, Karen Cecere, John Unterborn
1School of Pharmacy, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Insights
Severe sepsis quality indicator bundles from IHI, JCAHO, and VHA show significant variability in compliance rates and associated patient factors. Developing a unified bundle is crucial for reliable benchmarking and improving sepsis care quality.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
- Sepsis Management
Background:
- Multiple quality indicator bundles exist for severe sepsis treatment: Voluntary Hospitals of America (VHA), Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), and Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO).
- Suspected differences in quality indicators among these bundles may result in inconsistent benchmarking data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare bundle compliance rates across the IHI, JCAHO, and VHA severe sepsis bundles.
- To identify patient factors associated with compliance for each bundle.
- To explore reasons for observed variability in compliance and associated factors.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective, noninterventional study design.
- Evaluation of 50 adult severe sepsis patients admitted to a university-affiliated hospital's intensive care unit.
- Analysis of compliance with quality indicators within the IHI, JCAHO, and VHA bundles.
Main Results:
- Few patients achieved high compliance (≥75%) with any bundle (IHI 22%, JCAHO 6%, VHA 22%).
- Significant differences in meeting ≥50% of indicators were observed between JCAHO (28%) and IHI (66%) or VHA (60%).
- Compliance was associated with shock, higher APACHE II scores, multiple organ failures, and survival, varying by bundle.
Conclusions:
- Discrepancies among severe sepsis bundles cause variability in compliance and associated patient factors, potentially confusing institutional benchmarking.
- A single, valid, and reliable bundle is needed to standardize and improve the quality of severe sepsis care.
Background:
While 3 different quality indicator bundles are either approved (Voluntary Hospitals of America [VHA], Institute for Healthcare Improvement [IHI]) or proposed (Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations [JCAHO]) to rate clinical practices in treatment of severe sepsis, it is suspected that differences in the quality indicators among these bundles may lead to discrepant benchmarking data.
Objective:
To compare bundle compliance and patient factors associated with it among the IHI, JCAHO, and VHA severe sepsis bundles and explore possible reasons for any observed variability.
Methods:
Using a retrospective, noninterventional design, we evaluated 50 adults (APACHE II score 25 +/- 6, organ failure 2 +/- 1, and shock 52%) with severe sepsis who were admitted consecutively to an intensive care unit at a 450 bed university-affiliated hospital.
Results:
Few patients met 100% (IHI 6%, JCAHO 0%, VHA 6%) or 75% or greater (IHI 22%, JCAHO 6%, VHA 22%) of the quality indicators in each bundle. The number of patients who met 50% or more of the quality indicators varied significantly between JCAHO (28%) and both IHI (66%; p < 0.001) and VHA (60%; p < 0.001), but not between IHI and VHA (p = 0.53). Compliance with 50% or more of the quality indicators was more likely to occur when patients had shock (IHI, JCAHO, VHA), an APACHE II score greater than or equal to 25 (VHA), 2 or more organ failures (VHA), or survived hospitalization (IHI). We identified a number of factors that may help explain these differences.
Conclusions:
Differences among the IHI, JCAHO, and VHA severe sepsis bundles lead to variability in bundle compliance rates and the patient factors associated with the variability and may lead to confusion when benchmarking practices among institutions. Future efforts should focus on developing a single valid and reliable bundle that allows providers to improve the quality of sepsis care.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin create...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness, disability,...
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Determinants of Bacterial Pathogenicity and Virulence
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...