Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating the predictiveness of a continuous marker.

Ying Huang1, Margaret Sullivan Pepe, Ziding Feng

  • 1University of Washington Biostatistics Department, F-600 Health Sciences Building, Box 357232, Seattle, Washington 98195-7232, USA.

Biometrics
|May 11, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Response.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2014
Same author

Estimating the receiver operating characteristic curve in studies that match controls to cases on covariates.

Academic radiology·2013
Same author

Estimating improvement in prediction with matched case-control designs.

Lifetime data analysis·2013
Same author

When does combining markers improve classification performance and what are implications for practice?

Statistics in medicine·2013
Same author

Testing for improvement in prediction model performance.

Statistics in medicine·2013
Same author

Semiparametric methods for evaluating risk prediction markers in case-control studies.

Biometrika·2012
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces the predictiveness curve, a graphical tool to assess how well a marker predicts a binary outcome. It offers a standardized scale for comparing diverse markers, enhancing risk prediction analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Informatics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Continuous markers are used to predict binary outcomes, such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for prostate cancer detection.
  • Evaluating the predictive capacity of these markers often relies on their original scales, hindering direct comparison.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and validate the predictiveness curve as a graphical tool for assessing marker predictive capacity.
  • To provide a common, meaningful scale for comparing the predictiveness of markers regardless of their original units.
  • To develop methods for inference, comparison, and covariate effect evaluation using the predictiveness curve.

Main Methods:

  • The predictiveness curve is proposed to display the population distribution of risk given a marker.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical methods are developed for inferring the predictiveness curve.
  • Pointwise comparisons between two curves and evaluation of covariate effects are addressed.

    • Main Results:

    • The predictiveness curve offers a standardized scale for comparing markers with different original scales.
    • Existing measures of predictiveness can be viewed as summary indices derived from the predictiveness curve.
    • The developed methods allow for robust statistical inference and comparison of predictive performance.

    Conclusions:

    • The predictiveness curve is a valuable tool for evaluating and comparing the predictive capacity of continuous markers.
    • It facilitates a more intuitive understanding of risk prediction and marker performance across different applications.
    • The methodology supports applications in cancer risk prediction and other areas like cystic fibrosis.