Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Consent for mastoidectomy: a patient's perspective.

Eleanor Mein1, Ausama Alaani, Richard Vaughn Jones

  • 1ENT Department, Worcester Royal Hospital, Worcestershire, United Kingdom.

Auris, Nasus, Larynx
|May 11, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Transtemporal approach to otogenic brain abscesses.

Acta oto-laryngologica·2010
Same author

New approach to the endoscopic repair of a CSF leak originating from the lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus.

Ear, nose, & throat journal·2010
Same author

Methods of hearing assessment in children.

British journal of hospital medicine (London, England : 2005)·2010
Same author

The use of silastic nasal splints in the treatment of chronic epistaxis and nasal septal ulceration.

Ear, nose, & throat journal·2006
Same author

An ocular medication dispensing error.

British journal of clinical pharmacology·2006
Same author

Granulocytic sarcoma of the nasal cavity.

Rhinology·2002

Patients undergoing mastoidectomy want to be informed of all surgical risks, including rare intracranial complications. Surgeons often omit these crucial details, potentially leading to legal issues due to inadequate informed consent.

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Medical Ethics
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • Informed consent is crucial in medical procedures like mastoidectomy.
  • Increasing medico-legal litigation highlights issues with current consenting processes.
  • Discrepancies exist between patient expectations and surgeon practices regarding risk disclosure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare patient perspectives on essential information for mastoidectomy consent.
  • To contrast this with the information routinely provided by ENT consultants.
  • To address the growing concern of inadequate informed consent in surgical procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Surveyed 19 patients who underwent mastoid surgery on perceived important risks.
  • Compared patient responses with a survey of 20 ENT consultants on routinely discussed risks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed discrepancies in risk disclosure between patients and surgeons.

    • Main Results:

    • Patients expect information on all risks, excluding keloid scarring and altered taste.
    • Consultants routinely discuss most risks, omitting bleeding, intracranial complications, and keloid scarring.
    • A significant gap exists in discussing intracranial complications (84.2% of patients vs. 20% of surgeons).

    Conclusions:

    • Surgeons omit rare or distressing risks like intracranial complications.
    • Patient desire for comprehensive information, including rare risks, is high.
    • Failure to provide comprehensive consent, especially regarding serious risks, may be legally indefensible.