Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Counting phylogenetic invariants in some simple cases.

J Felsenstein1

  • 1Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

Journal of Theoretical Biology
|October 7, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Coalescents, Phylogenies, and Likelihoods.

The Biological bulletin·2017
Same author

The troubled growth of statistical phylogenetics.

Systematic biology·2002
Same author

Taking variation of evolutionary rates between sites into account in inferring phylogenies.

Journal of molecular evolution·2001
Same author

Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2001
Same author

Maximum likelihood estimation of recombination rates from population data.

Genetics·2000
Same author

Sampling among haplotype resolutions in a coalescent-based genealogy sampler.

Genetic epidemiology·2000
Same journal

Evolution of quantitative traits: exploring the ecological, social and genetic bases of adaptive polymorphism.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

The male-biased sex ratio in humans and its role in the transition from promiscuity to pair bonding.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

Quantifying the counter-intuitive effects of vaccination by coupling the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 and the evolution of human behaviors.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

An integrative model of FGF2-induced signaling and muscle cell proliferation.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

A hybrid reaction-diffusion and mechanical stimulus model for mandibular bone remodeling under chewing and vibratory loading.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

Integrated tick management strategies in fragmented peridomestic environments.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

This study counts phylogenetic invariants using a degrees of freedom argument for the Jukes-Cantor model. It identifies new cubic and linear invariants, clarifying the nature of previously found linear invariants.

Area of Science:

  • Phylogenetics
  • Computational Biology
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • Phylogenetic invariants are crucial for inferring evolutionary relationships from molecular data.
  • Understanding the number and nature of these invariants aids in model selection and phylogenetic reconstruction.
  • The Jukes-Cantor model is a fundamental model for DNA sequence evolution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To count the number of phylogenetic invariants for three and four species under the Jukes-Cantor model.
  • To identify new classes of invariants and characterize their properties.
  • To re-evaluate previously identified linear invariants in the context of the Jukes-Cantor model.

Main Methods:

  • An informal degrees of freedom argument was employed to count invariants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis was conducted for scenarios with and without a molecular clock.
  • Specific cases involving three and four species were examined.

    • Main Results:

    • The number of phylogenetic invariants was determined for simple cases under the Jukes-Cantor model.
    • Two new classes of invariants were discovered: non-phylogenetic cubic invariants and linear phylogenetic invariants.
    • Most linear invariants previously identified by Cavender (1989) were shown to be tests of substitution model symmetry, not true phylogenetic invariants, in the Jukes-Cantor framework.

    Conclusions:

    • The study provides a method for counting phylogenetic invariants and identifies novel invariant types.
    • The findings clarify the interpretation of linear invariants in phylogenetic analysis under the Jukes-Cantor model.
    • This work contributes to a deeper understanding of evolutionary models and phylogenetic inference.