Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Methods of Documentation II: POMR01:26

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

The Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR) revolutionized medical record-keeping by introducing a systematic approach focusing on the patient's problems rather than merely listing symptoms. Dr. Lawrence Weed's introduction of this method in the 1960s marked a significant advancement in medical documentation. The POMR framework consists of four key components: the database, problem list, plan of care, and progress notes.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of a multidisciplinary syllabus to support the education and training of roles in cystic fibrosis care: An ECFS Education initiative.

Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society·2025
Same author

What are 'dark kitchens'? A consensus definition from public, local authority, business and academic stakeholders in the United Kingdom.

Perspectives in public health·2025
Same author

The influence of circulating cholesterol and its components in middle-aged adults on cognitive function at mid- and later-life; a systematic review.

Frontiers in aging·2025
Same author

Hypothalamic vasopressin neural densities are higher in male Mongolian gerbils after separation from a pair bond partner and may facilitate behavior to form a new bond.

Behavioural brain research·2024
Same author

The inclusion of adults with intellectual disabilities in health research - challenges, barriers and opportunities: a mixed-method study among stakeholders in England.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2023
Same author

Neuraxial buprenorphine for post-cesarean delivery analgesia: a case series.

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

Best practice in primary care pathology: review 10.

W S A Smellie1, N Shaw, R Bowley

  • 1Department of Chemical Pathology, Bishop Auckland General Hospital, Bishop Auckland, UK. info@smellie.com

Journal of Clinical Pathology
|May 15, 2007
PubMed
Summary

This review provides guidance on four common laboratory tests in primary care settings. It addresses antenatal testing, estimated glomerular filtration rate calculation, methotrexate safety testing, and blood glucose measurement in diabetes. The recommendations are based on a synthesis of national and international guidelines, policy documents, and primary research. The authors emphasize that the guide should be adapted to clinical context and updated regularly. Most recommendations are consensus-based rather than evidence-based. The review is presented in a question-answer format for clarity.

Keywords:
primary care laboratory medicineclinical guidelines developmentevidence-based medicineantenatal testing

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Comparative Lesions Analysis Through a Targeted Sequencing Approach
08:16

Comparative Lesions Analysis Through a Targeted Sequencing Approach

Published on: November 5, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

Comparative Lesions Analysis Through a Targeted Sequencing Approach
08:16

Comparative Lesions Analysis Through a Targeted Sequencing Approach

Published on: November 5, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Primary care laboratory medicine
  • Clinical guidelines development
  • Evidence-based medicine

Background:

Prior research has established the importance of laboratory testing in primary care settings, but gaps remain in standardizing best practices. Existing studies focus on individual tests but lack consolidated guidance. No prior work had resolved how to systematically integrate national and international guidelines with primary research. This gap motivated the need for a structured review approach. The review approach aims to synthesize available guidance into a practical guide for clinicians. It addresses the challenge of varying recommendations across different sources. The review approach is designed to be adaptable to clinical contexts. It emphasizes the need for periodic updates as new information emerges.

Purpose Of The Study:

The purpose of the study is to compile best practices for four common primary care laboratory questions. These questions include antenatal testing, estimated glomerular filtration rate calculation, methotrexate safety testing, and blood glucose measurement. The study aims to provide a concise guide for primary care clinicians. It addresses the lack of standardized recommendations in these areas. The study is motivated by the variability in clinical guidance across regions. It seeks to bridge the gap between evidence and practice. The study is designed to be a reference tool for primary care pathology. It aims to support informed decision-making in clinical settings.

Main Methods:

The review approach involves a standardised literature search of national and international guidance notes. The method includes consensus statements and health policy documents. The method also incorporates evidence-based medicine reviews. Medline and Embase searches identify relevant primary research. The method is structured around four series of common questions. The method uses a question-answer format for clarity. The method references each question series with supporting literature. The method emphasizes the need for contextual application of recommendations.

Main Results:

The key findings from the literature include guidance on antenatal testing in pregnant women. The findings suggest estimated glomerular filtration rate calculation methods. The findings propose safety testing protocols for methotrexate use. The findings include recommendations for blood glucose measurement in diabetes. The findings are based on a synthesis of guidance and primary research. The findings highlight the importance of periodic updates to recommendations. The findings emphasize the clinical context in applying guidelines. The findings suggest that most recommendations are consensus-based rather than evidence-based.

Conclusions:

The synthesis and implications focus on the need for adaptable clinical guidance. The authors propose that recommendations should be set in clinical context. The authors suggest that most guidance is consensus-based. The authors highlight the importance of periodic updates. The authors emphasize the structured review approach as a guide. The authors propose that the guide should not be treated as standards. The authors suggest that the guide supports informed clinical decisions. The authors propose that the guide should be updated as new information emerges.

The review synthesizes best practices for four common primary care laboratory questions.

The recommendations are derived from a standardized literature search of guidance and primary research.

The authors propose that the guide should be adapted to clinical context rather than applied as rigid standards.

Medline and Embase searches identify relevant primary research to supplement guidance documents.

The authors propose that recommendations will be updated periodically to include new information.

The authors suggest that most recommendations are consensus-based rather than evidence-based.