Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Personal and public perceptions of radiation risks.

W R Hendee1

  • 1American Medical Association, Chicago.

Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc
|November 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

Communicating radiation risks effectively requires addressing public fear and emotions before presenting facts. A trusted community health expert is ideal for discussing radiation risks and benefits.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The World Wide Web is a net disservice to medical physicists in developing countries.

Medical physics·2002
Same author

New radiation therapy rooms should be designed to accomodate treatments of the future such as IMRT and tomotherapy.

Medical physics·2001
Same author

The future will not need clinical therapy physicists.

Medical physics·2001
Same author

Medical physics education programs should include an in-depth course in statistics and mathematical modeling of human anatomy and physiology.

Medical physics·2001
Same author

Engineering is preferred over physics as an undergraduate preparation for diagnostic and nuclear medical physicists.

Medical physics·2001
Same author

The routine use of personal patient dosimeters is of little value in detecting therapeutic misadministrations.

Medical physics·2001

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Health Communication
  • Risk Perception

Background:

  • Public perception of radiation risks is often negative, influenced by media portrayals.
  • Radiation exposure can be viewed as both a voluntary and involuntary risk.
  • Emotional responses often overshadow rational understanding of risk information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore effective communication strategies for medical radiation exposure.
  • To identify key factors influencing public perception of radiation risks.
  • To propose an optimal approach for discussing radiation risks and benefits.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of public perception and media influence on radiation fears.
  • Evaluation of emotional versus intellectual responses to risk communication.
  • Identification of characteristics for an effective risk communicator.

Main Results:

  • The public often fears radiation due to media and emotional responses, not solely factual understanding.
  • A trusted community health expert with no conflict of interest is best suited to communicate risks.
  • Addressing emotional perceptions is crucial before presenting factual information on radiation risks.

Conclusions:

  • Effective communication of radiation risks necessitates acknowledging and addressing public emotions first.
  • Building trust with a knowledgeable and respected community health expert is vital.
  • A balanced discussion of radiation risks and benefits can be achieved once trust and emotional concerns are managed.

Related Experiment Videos