Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Diagnostic pitfalls in abdominal CT.

A Shirkhoda1

  • 1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, William Beaumont Hospital Royal Oak, MI 48073.

Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc
|November 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma mimicking a nerve sheath tumor clinically and on MR imaging.

Skeletal radiology·2006
Same author

Cardiac arrest: abdominal CT imaging features.

Abdominal imaging·2004
Same author

Normal variants and pitfalls in CT of the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts.

Abdominal imaging·2002
Same author

Adductor insertion avulsion syndrome.

Clinical nuclear medicine·2001
Same author

Urethral leiomyosarcoma: evaluation by MRI with pathologic correlation.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·2000
Same author

Breath-hold 3D MR angiography of the renal vasculature using a contrast-enhanced multiecho gradient-echo technique.

Investigative radiology·1999
Same journal

Invited Commentary: Postdeployment Monitoring of AI in Radiology: Beyond the Test Set.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Rosai-Dorfman Disease: Imaging and Updates.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Spectrum of Breast Sarcomas with Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Postdeployment Monitoring and Surveillance Methods, Guidelines, and Possibilities for AI in Radiology.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Clinical Correlation for Imaging of Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same journal

Invited Commentary: Three-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis: Imaging Insights Beyond the Operating Room.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
See all related articles

Suboptimal abdominal computed tomography (CT) interpretation stems from technique, observer errors, and missing clinical data. Addressing these pitfalls, including contrast administration and image reconstruction, improves diagnostic accuracy for abdominal masses.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Diagnostic Techniques

Background:

  • Abdominal computed tomography (CT) interpretation is prone to errors.
  • Factors like improper technique, observer errors, and lack of clinical information contribute to misdiagnoses.
  • Unopacified normal structures can mimic tumors due to inadequate contrast material administration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify common pitfalls in abdominal CT interpretation.
  • To provide strategies for improving diagnostic accuracy in abdominal CT.
  • To enhance the understanding of pseudotumors and anatomical variations in abdominal imaging.

Main Methods:

  • Review of common causes of suboptimal abdominal CT performance and interpretation errors.
  • Discussion of techniques to resolve pseudotumors, such as repeat scanning with contrast and sodium bicarbonate.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of image reconstruction methods (coronal/sagittal planes) and thin-section CT for improved delineation.

    • Main Results:

    • Inadequate oral contrast can lead to normal bowel structures simulating tumors.
    • Repeat scanning with contrast and sodium bicarbonate can clarify pseudotumors.
    • Image reconstruction and thinner sections help differentiate true masses from anatomical variations and small lesions.
    • Knowledge of positional changes in organs due to surgery is crucial for accurate interpretation.

    Conclusions:

    • Familiarity with common pitfalls in abdominal CT interpretation is essential for accurate diagnosis.
    • Optimizing contrast administration, utilizing advanced imaging techniques, and considering clinical history can prevent misinterpretations.
    • Improved understanding and application of these strategies lead to more reliable abdominal CT scan interpretations.